All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
To: 'Marek Szyprowski' <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	'Krzysztof Kozlowski' <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	'Kukjin Kim' <kgene@kernel.org>,
	'Tobias Jakobi' <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>,
	'Daniel Drake' <drake@endlessm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] exynos: pmu: use PS_HOLD based poweroff for all supported SoCs
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:06:36 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <020001d06609$74970ee0$5dc52ca0$@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <550C3888.7050905@samsung.com>

Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
Hi,

> On 2015-02-09 11:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > 2015-02-09 10:06 GMT+01:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>:
> >> 2015-02-09 8:25 GMT+01:00 Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>:
> >>> PS_HOLD based power off procedure is common for all Exynos SoCs, so use
> >>> it for every Exynos SoC.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c | 6 +++---
> >>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> I tried this on Trats2 board (Exynos 4412) and message "Power down
> >> failed, please power off system manually." appears. Is it expected? Or
> >> am I missing some patches (I applied this on top of next-20150129)?
> > It was my fault (I left attached JIG cable which prevents power off).
> > Now it works fine.
> >
> > Tested on Trats2 (Exynos4412):
> > Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> >
> > Patch also looks good, so:
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> 
> Gentle ping for merging this in v4.1-next...
> 
OK, I'll queue this into v4.1-next/mach-samsung.

Just note, some newer SoC has different poweroff scheme not just using PS_HOLD
based so maybe we need to revisit the poweroff later ;-)

Thanks,
Kukjin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kgene@kernel.org (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] exynos: pmu: use PS_HOLD based poweroff for all supported SoCs
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:06:36 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <020001d06609$74970ee0$5dc52ca0$@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <550C3888.7050905@samsung.com>

Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
Hi,

> On 2015-02-09 11:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > 2015-02-09 10:06 GMT+01:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>:
> >> 2015-02-09 8:25 GMT+01:00 Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>:
> >>> PS_HOLD based power off procedure is common for all Exynos SoCs, so use
> >>> it for every Exynos SoC.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c | 6 +++---
> >>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> I tried this on Trats2 board (Exynos 4412) and message "Power down
> >> failed, please power off system manually." appears. Is it expected? Or
> >> am I missing some patches (I applied this on top of next-20150129)?
> > It was my fault (I left attached JIG cable which prevents power off).
> > Now it works fine.
> >
> > Tested on Trats2 (Exynos4412):
> > Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> >
> > Patch also looks good, so:
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> 
> Gentle ping for merging this in v4.1-next...
> 
OK, I'll queue this into v4.1-next/mach-samsung.

Just note, some newer SoC has different poweroff scheme not just using PS_HOLD
based so maybe we need to revisit the poweroff later ;-)

Thanks,
Kukjin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-24  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-09  7:25 [PATCH] exynos: pmu: use PS_HOLD based poweroff for all supported SoCs Marek Szyprowski
2015-02-09  7:25 ` Marek Szyprowski
2015-02-09  9:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-02-09  9:06   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-02-09 10:58   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-02-09 10:58     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-03-20 15:11     ` Marek Szyprowski
2015-03-20 15:11       ` Marek Szyprowski
2015-03-20 16:03       ` Tobias Jakobi
2015-03-20 16:03         ` Tobias Jakobi
2015-03-24  8:06       ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2015-03-24  8:06         ` Kukjin Kim
2015-05-20  6:31         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-05-20  6:31           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-02-09 20:24 ` Tobias Jakobi
2015-02-09 20:24   ` Tobias Jakobi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='020001d06609$74970ee0$5dc52ca0$@kernel.org' \
    --to=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=drake@endlessm.com \
    --cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.