* AMD Viper IDE chipset
@ 2001-12-02 17:32 Matt Schulkind
2001-12-03 7:27 ` Andre Hedrick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matt Schulkind @ 2001-12-02 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lkml
I'm currently using the Tyan Tiger mobo with the AMD Viper chipset. On past
kernels 2.4.14 and before definatly, hdparm -t gave me 3.8MB/s on my ATA100
drive. Using some IDE patch taht I'd found on the web, I was able to get to
28MB/s and 38MB/s with some tweaking. Now with the 2.4.16 kernel, I get
28MB/s which is a good improvement, but my drive is only being detected as
UDMA33, I have not tried forcing it to UDMA66 or UDMA100 like I had with the
IDE patch I found which had the same detecting problem. It seems that the
mode detection is broken, but the actual interface code is functioning.
Anyone else having similar problems? I'm using the IBM 60GB 75GXP drive.
-Matt Schulkind
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: AMD Viper IDE chipset
2001-12-02 17:32 AMD Viper IDE chipset Matt Schulkind
@ 2001-12-03 7:27 ` Andre Hedrick
2001-12-04 1:50 ` Dan Hollis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andre Hedrick @ 2001-12-03 7:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Schulkind; +Cc: lkml
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Matt Schulkind wrote:
> I'm currently using the Tyan Tiger mobo with the AMD Viper chipset. On past
> kernels 2.4.14 and before definatly, hdparm -t gave me 3.8MB/s on my ATA100
> drive. Using some IDE patch taht I'd found on the web, I was able to get to
> 28MB/s and 38MB/s with some tweaking. Now with the 2.4.16 kernel, I get
> 28MB/s which is a good improvement, but my drive is only being detected as
> UDMA33, I have not tried forcing it to UDMA66 or UDMA100 like I had with the
> IDE patch I found which had the same detecting problem. It seems that the
> mode detection is broken, but the actual interface code is functioning.
> Anyone else having similar problems? I'm using the IBM 60GB 75GXP drive.
>
> -Matt Schulkind
NAH, You just need the rest of my code but nobody is adopting it.
My code base on top on any kernel tested to date will give you that 25%
boost.
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick
Linux ATA Development
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: AMD Viper IDE chipset
2001-12-03 7:27 ` Andre Hedrick
@ 2001-12-04 1:50 ` Dan Hollis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Hollis @ 2001-12-04 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andre Hedrick; +Cc: Matt Schulkind, lkml
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> NAH, You just need the rest of my code but nobody is adopting it.
> My code base on top on any kernel tested to date will give you that 25%
> boost.
Tell me what kernel to test and what patch to apply and I will test it.
-Dan
--
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-12-04 1:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-12-02 17:32 AMD Viper IDE chipset Matt Schulkind
2001-12-03 7:27 ` Andre Hedrick
2001-12-04 1:50 ` Dan Hollis
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.