From: "Kaigai Kohei" <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
To: "James Morris" <jmorris@redhat.com>
Cc: "Stephen Smalley" <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>,
"SELinux-ML(Eng)" <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>,
"Linux Kernel ML(Eng)" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RCU issue with SELinux (Re: SELINUX performance issues)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:51:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <024c01c48a89$283dd4f0$f97d220a@linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Xine.LNX.4.44.0408240908530.19614-100000@thoron.boston.redhat.com
Hi James, thanks for your comment.
> > o dbench [ 4 processes run parallely on 4-CPUs / 10 times trials ]
> > ---- mean ---- - STD -
> > 2.6.8.1(disable) 860.249 [MB/s] 44.683
> > 2.6.8.1(enable) 714.254 [MB/s] 32.359
> > 2.6.8.1(+rwlock) 767.904 [MB/s] 27.968
> > 2.6.8.1(+RCU) 830.678 [MB/s] 16.352
>
> Can you show the figures for 1 and 2 clients?
The results are as follows:
o dbench [ 1/2/4 processes run parallely on 4-CPUs / 10 times trials ]
- Average[MB/s] - -1proc- -2procs- -4procs-
2.6.8.1(disable) 247.43 473.11 891.51
2.6.8.1(enable) 218.99 434.97 761.06
2.6.8.1(+rwlock) 225.18 432.80 802.62
2.6.8.1(+RCU) 231.84 444.30 820.00
--------------------------------------------
(*) 2.6.8.1(+RCU) is applied the take3-patch.
By the way, the results of dbench are sharply changed at every measurement.
I don't think it is statistically-significant.
--------
Kai Gai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kaigai Kohei" <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
To: "James Morris" <jmorris@redhat.com>
Cc: "Stephen Smalley" <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>,
"SELinux-ML(Eng)" <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>,
"Linux Kernel ML(Eng)" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RCU issue with SELinux (Re: SELINUX performance issues)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:51:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <024c01c48a89$283dd4f0$f97d220a@linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Xine.LNX.4.44.0408240908530.19614-100000@thoron.boston.redhat.com
Hi James, thanks for your comment.
> > o dbench [ 4 processes run parallely on 4-CPUs / 10 times trials ]
> > ---- mean ---- - STD -
> > 2.6.8.1(disable) 860.249 [MB/s] 44.683
> > 2.6.8.1(enable) 714.254 [MB/s] 32.359
> > 2.6.8.1(+rwlock) 767.904 [MB/s] 27.968
> > 2.6.8.1(+RCU) 830.678 [MB/s] 16.352
>
> Can you show the figures for 1 and 2 clients?
The results are as follows:
o dbench [ 1/2/4 processes run parallely on 4-CPUs / 10 times trials ]
- Average[MB/s] - -1proc- -2procs- -4procs-
2.6.8.1(disable) 247.43 473.11 891.51
2.6.8.1(enable) 218.99 434.97 761.06
2.6.8.1(+rwlock) 225.18 432.80 802.62
2.6.8.1(+RCU) 231.84 444.30 820.00
--------------------------------------------
(*) 2.6.8.1(+RCU) is applied the take3-patch.
By the way, the results of dbench are sharply changed at every measurement.
I don't think it is statistically-significant.
--------
Kai Gai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-25 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-16 9:33 RCU issue with SELinux (Re: SELINUX performance issues) Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-16 9:33 ` Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-16 15:19 ` James Morris
2004-08-16 15:19 ` James Morris
2004-08-20 13:36 ` Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-20 14:53 ` James Morris
2004-08-20 14:53 ` James Morris
2004-08-24 7:27 ` Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-24 7:27 ` Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-24 13:24 ` James Morris
2004-08-24 13:24 ` James Morris
2004-08-25 9:51 ` Kaigai Kohei [this message]
2004-08-25 9:51 ` Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-25 18:31 ` James Morris
2004-08-25 18:31 ` James Morris
2004-08-25 9:52 ` [PATCH]atomic_inc_return() for i386/x86_64 (Re: RCU issue with SELinux) Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-20 17:31 ` RCU issue with SELinux (Re: SELINUX performance issues) Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-08-20 17:31 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-08-20 18:15 ` James Morris
2004-08-20 18:15 ` James Morris
2004-08-20 20:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-08-20 20:35 ` James Morris
2004-08-20 20:35 ` James Morris
2004-08-24 7:27 ` Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-24 7:27 ` Kaigai Kohei
[not found] ` <1093014789.16585.186.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
2004-08-24 7:25 ` Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-24 15:37 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-24 15:37 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-25 9:51 ` Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-25 15:50 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-25 15:50 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-25 16:11 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-25 16:11 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-26 7:53 ` Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-26 7:53 ` Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-26 13:24 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-26 13:24 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-27 11:07 ` Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-27 11:07 ` Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-30 11:17 ` [PATCH]SELinux performance improvement by RCU (Re: RCU issue with SELinux) Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-30 15:35 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-30 15:35 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-30 16:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-08-30 16:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-08-31 4:33 ` Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-31 4:33 ` Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-31 16:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-08-31 16:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-08-31 15:33 ` James Morris
2004-08-31 15:33 ` James Morris
2004-08-24 23:02 ` RCU issue with SELinux (Re: SELINUX performance issues) Paul E. McKenney
2004-08-24 23:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-08-25 9:51 ` Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-25 9:51 ` Kaigai Kohei
2004-08-25 17:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-08-25 17:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='024c01c48a89$283dd4f0$f97d220a@linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp' \
--to=kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.