All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
To: tsuna <tsunanet@gmail.com>
Cc: "H.K. Jerry Chu" <hkjerry.chu@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
	<pekkas@netcore.fi>, <jmorris@namei.org>,
	<yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>, <kaber@trash.net>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: Expose the initial RTO via a new sysctl.
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 17:43:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0328b2351e8e11a19301262842ef0491@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikuW7VF8AUPFYHYzGe7mXp5H_emjA@mail.gmail.com>


On Tue, 31 May 2011 08:28:18 -0700, tsuna <tsunanet@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry I meant a knob such as /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_initrto.

That's the same! ;-)

>> The initRTO is the ideal candidate for a
>> per route knob. And happily you will solve 2) with the per route thing
>> too!
> 
> You still need a knob for the default system-wide value, don't you?

Yes, try to re-read the emails. Sysctl is a no-go, with a per route
interface you have the ability to tune the values. Talk with Jerry once
again - he wrote that at Google they already have a patch for this. And
with a per route knob you can select a even smaller value for your local
network (e.g. datacenter) and a larger value for all other routes. It makes
sense to provide a knob for this on a route basis, not on a global sysctl
basis.

But once again: talk with Jerry - he has the expert knowledge!

Hagen

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
To: tsuna <tsunanet@gmail.com>
Cc: "H.K. Jerry Chu" <hkjerry.chu@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
	<pekkas@netcore.fi>, <jmorris@namei.org>,
	<yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>, <kaber@trash.net>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: Expose the initial RTO via a new sysctl.
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 17:43:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0328b2351e8e11a19301262842ef0491@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikuW7VF8AUPFYHYzGe7mXp5H_emjA@mail.gmail.com>


On Tue, 31 May 2011 08:28:18 -0700, tsuna <tsunanet@gmail.com> wrote:



> Sorry I meant a knob such as /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_initrto.



That's the same! ;-)



>> The initRTO is the ideal candidate for a

>> per route knob. And happily you will solve 2) with the per route thing

>> too!

> 

> You still need a knob for the default system-wide value, don't you?



Yes, try to re-read the emails. Sysctl is a no-go, with a per route

interface you have the ability to tune the values. Talk with Jerry once

again - he wrote that at Google they already have a patch for this. And

with a per route knob you can select a even smaller value for your local

network (e.g. datacenter) and a larger value for all other routes. It makes

sense to provide a knob for this on a route basis, not on a global sysctl

basis.



But once again: talk with Jerry - he has the expert knowledge!



Hagen

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-31 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-17  7:40 [PATCH] tcp: Expose the initial RTO via a new sysctl Benoit Sigoure
2011-05-17  7:40 ` Benoit Sigoure
2011-05-17  8:01   ` Alexander Zimmermann
2011-05-17  8:34     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-17  8:07   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-17 11:02     ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-17 11:02       ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-17 12:20       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-18 10:43     ` Benoit Sigoure
2011-05-18 19:26       ` David Miller
2011-05-18 19:40         ` tsuna
2011-05-18 19:52           ` David Miller
2011-05-18 20:20             ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-18 20:23               ` David Miller
2011-05-18 20:27                 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-20 10:27               ` H.K. Jerry Chu
2011-05-20 11:00                 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-20 11:00                   ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-20 12:37                   ` Alan Cox
2011-05-21  0:06                   ` H.K. Jerry Chu
2011-05-31 14:48                     ` tsuna
2011-05-31 15:25                       ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-31 15:25                         ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-31 15:28                         ` tsuna
2011-05-31 15:43                           ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer [this message]
2011-05-31 15:43                             ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-19  2:22             ` [PATCH] tcp: Implement a two-level initial RTO as per draft RFC 2988bis-02 Benoit Sigoure
2011-05-19  2:22               ` Benoit Sigoure
2011-05-19  2:36               ` David Miller
2011-05-19  3:56                 ` tsuna
2011-05-19  4:14                   ` David Miller
2011-05-19  4:33                     ` tsuna
2011-05-19  5:46                       ` David Miller
2011-05-19  6:36                         ` [PATCH] tcp: Lower the initial RTO to 1s " Benoit Sigoure
2011-05-19  6:36                           ` Benoit Sigoure
2011-05-19 17:42                           ` Yuchung Cheng
2011-05-19  6:47                         ` Benoit Sigoure
2011-05-19  6:47                           ` Benoit Sigoure
2011-05-19 20:16                           ` David Miller
2011-05-19  6:10                       ` [PATCH] tcp: Implement a two-level initial RTO " Alexander Zimmermann
2011-05-19  6:25                         ` tsuna
2011-05-19  6:36                           ` Alexander Zimmermann
2011-05-19  6:42                             ` tsuna
2011-05-19  6:52                               ` Alexander Zimmermann
2011-05-19  7:07                                 ` tsuna
2011-05-19  8:02                                 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-19  8:02                                   ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-19 16:40                                   ` tsuna
2011-05-19 16:55                                     ` Alexander Zimmermann
2011-05-19 17:11                                       ` tsuna
2011-05-19 19:27                                         ` David Miller
2011-05-19 20:30                                           ` tsuna
2011-05-20  2:01           ` [PATCH] tcp: Expose the initial RTO via a new sysctl H.K. Jerry Chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0328b2351e8e11a19301262842ef0491@localhost \
    --to=hagen@jauu.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hkjerry.chu@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
    --cc=tsunanet@gmail.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.