From: SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com>
To: 'Paolo Bonzini' <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"'Michael S. Tsirkin'" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: 'Markus Armbruster' <armbru@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fixed mismatch of error-handling between pci_qdev_init() and qdev
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:26:01 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <045901cff969$02203060$06609120$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <545A3A61.50001@redhat.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonzini@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
> Bonzini
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 11:55 PM
> To: Michael S. Tsirkin
> Cc: Markus Armbruster; SeokYeon Hwang; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fixed mismatch of error-handling
> between pci_qdev_init() and qdev
>
>
>
> On 05/11/2014 14:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > I think bypassing the question by converting to realize makes the
> > > most sense...
> >
> > I'm fine with doing that but Markus's patches wouldn't yet have solved
> > the problem by themselves since init is still around, right?
> >
> > This probably means fixing this bug can't justify merging the realize
> > patchset after freeze.
>
> Yes, I agree. I meant that the API is not very well defined. I would
> handle everything else on a case-by-case basis, by reviewing each init
> function that is converted to realize.
>
> Since the patch was for an out-of-tree device, it can wait for 2.3 anyway.
>
> Paolo
I cannot fully understand your conversation.
But, I think this patch is still worth before all 'init()' convert to
'realize()'.
Moreover, It has no side effect at all.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-06 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-05 10:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fixed mismatch of error-handling between pci_qdev_init() and qdev SeokYeon Hwang
2014-11-05 10:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-05 12:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-11-05 13:16 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-11-05 13:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-05 13:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-11-05 14:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-06 2:26 ` SeokYeon Hwang [this message]
2014-11-06 9:20 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-11-06 9:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-11-06 9:41 ` SeokYeon Hwang
2014-11-06 9:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-11-07 4:17 ` SeokYeon Hwang
2014-11-07 7:45 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-11-10 8:24 ` SeokYeon Hwang
2014-11-10 8:50 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-11-05 13:28 ` SeokYeon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='045901cff969$02203060$06609120$@samsung.com' \
--to=syeon.hwang@samsung.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.