All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@ltc.com>
To: <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 / glibc 2.2.3 cross-toolchain
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 23:49:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <046001c12086$4ba02ee0$3501010a@ltc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 040c01c1207d$78b62b90$3501010a@ltc.com

I've chronicled my cross-toolchain mips-adventures at:

http://www.ltc.com/~brad/mips/mipsel-linux-cross-toolchain-building.txt

I included a copy of the glibc patch that has the MAP_BASE_ADDR fix in it in
the same directory, namely:

http://www.ltc.com/~brad/mips/

Regards,
Brad

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@ltc.com>
To: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@ltc.com>; "Daniel Jacobowitz"
<dan@debian.org>
Cc: <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 / glibc 2.2.3 cross-toolchain


> Woohoo!  It works!  Thanks!  I was using H. J. Lu's first patch and that
was
> broken.  I found the second patch and it worked, except it left the first
> line in rtld-ldscript.in, when it really should have removed the file
> entirely.  Looks like it's right in the glibc CVS though.
>
> Regards,
> Brad
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@ltc.com>
> To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <dan@debian.org>
> Cc: <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 7:58 PM
> Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 / glibc 2.2.3 cross-toolchain
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <dan@debian.org>
> > To: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@ltc.com>
> > Cc: <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 7:45 PM
> > Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 / glibc 2.2.3 cross-toolchain
> >
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 07:42:17PM -0400, Bradley D. LaRonde wrote:
> > > > I have spent quite a bit of time trying to get a gcc 3.0 / glibc
2.2.3
> > > > cross-toolchain working.  I am not a Toolchain Builder, but I really
> > wanted
> > > > to try this combo and I don't see any way around building it myself.
> > > >
> > > > I've had some success.  Everything seems to build fine.  However,
when
> I
> > try
> > > > to run a simple "hello world" dynamically linked with glibc, I get
> this:
> > > >
> > > >     <myprogram>: error while loading shared libraries: failed to map
> > > >     segment from shared object: cannot load shared object file:
> Invalid
> > > > argument
> > > >
> > > > I think it is trying to load libc.so.6, which is in my root in
/lib/,
> > > > symlinked to libc-2.2.3.so, and so is ld.so.1, symlinked to
> ld-2.2.3.so.
> > > >
> > > > I feel like I am pretty close, but I am starting to get discouraged
> and
> > > > could really use some help.  I really am clueless about what
> > > > should/shouldn't work.  I'm trying to do this based on bits and
pieces
> > of
> > > > information that I've collected from countless sources.  I have
heard
> > that
> > > > gcc 3.0 isn't really "working", but I still want to try.
> > > >
> > > > Here is what I've used:
> > > >
> > > >    * binutils-2.11.90.0.25.tar.gz (extracted from H. J. Lu's
> > > >      srpm on oss.sgi.com; I've tried others also)
> > > >    * gcc-3.0.tar.gz (released version - no patches)
> > > >    * glibc-linuxthreads-2.2.3.tar.gz (released version - no
> > > >      patches; glibc didn't want to configure without this)
> > > >    * glibc-2.2.3.tar.gz (released version)
> > >
> > > You're missing the patch to change MAP_BASE_ADDR.  You need that.
> > > Something as simple as changing it to 0 will work for you, since
you're
> > > building everything yourself.
> >
> > I tried applying the patch that H. J. Lu posted on linux-mips that
> contains
> > that fix, but then glibc would compile.  I'll try it again - maybe I
> messed
> > something up.  If that doesn't work, I'll try the simple fix.  Thanks.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Brad

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@ltc.com>
To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 / glibc 2.2.3 cross-toolchain
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 23:49:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <046001c12086$4ba02ee0$3501010a@ltc.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20010809034930.qoHAYu_dG6KSBB_aN8ipj_VYq1f7lCJtSNmQ8Jy6JGU@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 040c01c1207d$78b62b90$3501010a@ltc.com

I've chronicled my cross-toolchain mips-adventures at:

http://www.ltc.com/~brad/mips/mipsel-linux-cross-toolchain-building.txt

I included a copy of the glibc patch that has the MAP_BASE_ADDR fix in it in
the same directory, namely:

http://www.ltc.com/~brad/mips/

Regards,
Brad

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@ltc.com>
To: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@ltc.com>; "Daniel Jacobowitz"
<dan@debian.org>
Cc: <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 / glibc 2.2.3 cross-toolchain


> Woohoo!  It works!  Thanks!  I was using H. J. Lu's first patch and that
was
> broken.  I found the second patch and it worked, except it left the first
> line in rtld-ldscript.in, when it really should have removed the file
> entirely.  Looks like it's right in the glibc CVS though.
>
> Regards,
> Brad
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@ltc.com>
> To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <dan@debian.org>
> Cc: <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 7:58 PM
> Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 / glibc 2.2.3 cross-toolchain
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <dan@debian.org>
> > To: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@ltc.com>
> > Cc: <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 7:45 PM
> > Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 / glibc 2.2.3 cross-toolchain
> >
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 07:42:17PM -0400, Bradley D. LaRonde wrote:
> > > > I have spent quite a bit of time trying to get a gcc 3.0 / glibc
2.2.3
> > > > cross-toolchain working.  I am not a Toolchain Builder, but I really
> > wanted
> > > > to try this combo and I don't see any way around building it myself.
> > > >
> > > > I've had some success.  Everything seems to build fine.  However,
when
> I
> > try
> > > > to run a simple "hello world" dynamically linked with glibc, I get
> this:
> > > >
> > > >     <myprogram>: error while loading shared libraries: failed to map
> > > >     segment from shared object: cannot load shared object file:
> Invalid
> > > > argument
> > > >
> > > > I think it is trying to load libc.so.6, which is in my root in
/lib/,
> > > > symlinked to libc-2.2.3.so, and so is ld.so.1, symlinked to
> ld-2.2.3.so.
> > > >
> > > > I feel like I am pretty close, but I am starting to get discouraged
> and
> > > > could really use some help.  I really am clueless about what
> > > > should/shouldn't work.  I'm trying to do this based on bits and
pieces
> > of
> > > > information that I've collected from countless sources.  I have
heard
> > that
> > > > gcc 3.0 isn't really "working", but I still want to try.
> > > >
> > > > Here is what I've used:
> > > >
> > > >    * binutils-2.11.90.0.25.tar.gz (extracted from H. J. Lu's
> > > >      srpm on oss.sgi.com; I've tried others also)
> > > >    * gcc-3.0.tar.gz (released version - no patches)
> > > >    * glibc-linuxthreads-2.2.3.tar.gz (released version - no
> > > >      patches; glibc didn't want to configure without this)
> > > >    * glibc-2.2.3.tar.gz (released version)
> > >
> > > You're missing the patch to change MAP_BASE_ADDR.  You need that.
> > > Something as simple as changing it to 0 will work for you, since
you're
> > > building everything yourself.
> >
> > I tried applying the patch that H. J. Lu posted on linux-mips that
> contains
> > that fix, but then glibc would compile.  I'll try it again - maybe I
> messed
> > something up.  If that doesn't work, I'll try the simple fix.  Thanks.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Brad

  reply	other threads:[~2001-08-09  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-08 23:42 gcc 3.0 / glibc 2.2.3 cross-toolchain Bradley D. LaRonde
2001-08-08 23:42 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2001-08-08 23:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-08-08 23:58   ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2001-08-08 23:58     ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2001-08-09  2:44     ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2001-08-09  2:44       ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2001-08-09  3:49       ` Bradley D. LaRonde [this message]
2001-08-09  3:49         ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2001-08-09 13:03         ` Arnaud Rolly
2001-08-09  7:11           ` Ilya Volynets

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='046001c12086$4ba02ee0$3501010a@ltc.com' \
    --to=brad@ltc.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.