[linux-lvm] LVM 0.9 vgscan problem

* [linux-lvm] LVM 0.9 vgscan problem
@ 2001-01-07  4:08 Brad Corsello
  2001-01-07 16:12 ` Jan Niehusmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Brad Corsello @ 2001-01-07  4:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-lvm

OK, Jan's patch fixed the vgextend problem on my machine, at least.  I
manually made the changes to the lvm.c that ships with 2.4.0 and recompiled
the module, and I succesfully did a few vgextend operations.  We're just
commenting out one line and adding two lines in a different place.  Jan's
patch does not appear to be against the version of lvm.c that ships with
2.4.0, so I didn't try to apply it.  A patch against the version of lvm.c that
ships with 2.4.0 follows (sorry if the format is wrong, I don't usually do
this sort of thing):

---------------

--- lvmbackup/lvm.c     Fri Jan  5 19:10:25 2001
+++ /usr/src/linux/drivers/md/lvm.c     Sat Jan  6 22:41:22 2001
@@ -2021,9 +2021,10 @@ static int lvm_do_vg_extend(vg_t *vg_ptr
                for (p = 0; p < vg_ptr->pv_max; p++) {
                        if ( ( pv_ptr = vg_ptr->pv[p]) == NULL) {
                                ret = lvm_do_pv_create(arg, vg_ptr, p);
-                               lvm_do_create_proc_entry_of_pv ( vg_ptr,
pv_ptr);
+/*                             lvm_do_create_proc_entry_of_pv ( vg_ptr,
pv_ptr); */
                                if ( ret != 0) return ret;
-       
+                               pv_ptr = vg_ptr->pv[p];
+                               lvm_do_create_proc_entry_of_pv ( vg_ptr,
pv_ptr);
                                /* We don't need the PE list
                                   in kernel space like LVs pe_t list */
                                pv_ptr->pe = NULL;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread