From: "Stuart MacDonald" <stuartm@connecttech.com>
To: "LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: TCP stack behaviour question
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:28:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <057a01c6d8ec$4d52c7b0$294b82ce@stuartm> (raw)
I'm having some trouble with a network application I've written. I've
done a lot of research the last few days; man 7 ip, man 7 tcp, kernel
2.4.31 source code, Stevens' Illustrated TCP/IP Vol 1 & 3 (for some
reason we don't have Vol 2), Usenet, websites. I'm hoping someone here
can help me out, or point me in the correct direction.
Distro: Debian 3.0 r2
Kernel: Stock 2.4.24
tcp_retries1 == 3
tcp_retries2 == 15
I have an application that setups up a TCP connection to a server. If
the server has a power failure, TCP starts retransmitting the packet
that wasn't ACKed. I see the exponential backoff.
Question 1: There's the original packet, plus 7 retransmitted packets
for a total of 8, then TCP gives up. How is 7 (or 8) derived from the
tcp_retries[12] settings?
Question 1a: The time between last and second-last retransmit packets
is only about 27 seconds. I've read there's a maximum time, but also
that it's usually 100 or 120 seconds. Where can I find that setting in
/proc?
Question 1b: If RTO is that high, why is retransmit stopping?
Question 2: After the retransmit has given up, the app is still
making an occasional write(), which succeeds! However, tearing down
and attemting a new connection results in an immediate EHOSTUNREACH
error. Why is the write() succeeding?
Question 2a: How can my app find out the EHOSTUNREACH error
immediately? IP_RECVERR is not implemented on TCP, and SO_ERROR always
reports no error (0).
..Stu
next reply other threads:[~2006-09-15 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-15 17:28 Stuart MacDonald [this message]
2006-09-18 8:29 ` TCP stack behaviour question Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 13:20 ` Stuart MacDonald
2006-09-18 13:54 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 14:19 ` Stuart MacDonald
2006-09-18 14:31 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 15:38 ` Michael Kerrisk
2006-09-18 17:01 ` Stuart MacDonald
2006-09-19 6:13 ` Michael Kerrisk
2006-09-19 6:47 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-19 14:50 ` Michael Kerrisk
2006-09-20 9:55 ` Andi Kleen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-18 18:29 Stuart MacDonald
2006-09-19 12:03 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-19 14:00 ` Stuart MacDonald
2006-09-20 9:54 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='057a01c6d8ec$4d52c7b0$294b82ce@stuartm' \
--to=stuartm@connecttech.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.