From: Julien Olivain <ju.o@free.fr>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH next 1/1] package/kexec: fix link error when BR2_OPTIMIZE_0=y
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 22:42:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <05dfe2d4e3f1f33c11959fe16bb2cac3@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230822223546.46d9ba7e@windsurf>
Hi Thomas,
On 22/08/2023 22:35, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 22:08:32 +0200
> Julien Olivain <ju.o@free.fr> wrote:
>
>> This could indeed go into the master branch. Since 2023.08-rc2 was
>> already tagged, I imagined only major fixes would go into master.
>> This one has been longstanding issue (so apparently not so important).
>>
>> In fact, reading the Buildroot documentation release engineering at
>> [1]
>> does really allow me to decide what kind of commits (security,
>> bugfixes,
>> new features, minor improvements like typos) should go to master/next.
>>
>> Recently, I had the same interpretation in [2] that a minor
>> improvement
>> (in which nothing was actually broken) should go to next. Yann
>> preferred
>> master.
>>
>> If you summarize those situations, I would be happy to propose a doc
>> improvement.
>
> Essentially, the idea after -rc1 is to stop applying version bumps and
> major changes in master so that master progressively converges to
> something "stable" that we can release. So, we can still merge
> improvements and fixes to master. As such, the build fix for kexec
> definitely qualifies. The license file improvement for lsof that you
> pointed also qualifies: it's an improvement, very low risk. Of course,
> there's always a grey area, even for version bumps: sometimes we take a
> version bump in master because it fixes security issues. Sometimes we
> prefer to backport the patch fixing the security issue rather than
> bumping when the number of other changes that take place with the
> version bump is too large.
>
> Does that help? :-)
Yes it does! From now on, I'll also include minor improvements and
bugfixes
to master. Thanks for the clarification.
>
> Thomas
Best regards,
Julien.
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-22 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-22 19:23 [Buildroot] [PATCH next 1/1] package/kexec: fix link error when BR2_OPTIMIZE_0=y Julien Olivain
2023-08-22 19:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2023-08-22 20:08 ` Julien Olivain
2023-08-22 20:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2023-08-22 20:42 ` Julien Olivain [this message]
2024-07-12 19:09 ` Arnout Vandecappelle via buildroot
2024-08-06 22:44 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=05dfe2d4e3f1f33c11959fe16bb2cac3@free.fr \
--to=ju.o@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@buildroot.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.