From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
To: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 18/26] drm/xe/oa: Handle force_wake_get failure in xe_oa_stream_init()
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 17:21:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0dc6be1f-a9bd-445e-a714-b0e7c321803e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241014075601.2324382-19-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
On 10/14/2024 9:55 AM, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
> With xe_force_wake_get() now returning the refcount-incremented domain
> mask, a non-zero return value in the case of XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL does not
> necessarily indicate success. use xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain ()
> to determine the status of the call.
>
> Modify the return handling of xe_force_wake_get() accordingly and pass
> the return value to xe_force_wake_put().
>
> v3
> - return xe_wakeref_t instead of int in xe_force_wake_get()
> - xe_force_wake_put() error doesn't need to be checked. It internally
> WARNS on domain ack failure.
>
> v5
> - return unsigned int from xe_force_wake_get()
>
> v6
> - Use helper xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain()
>
> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> index bbe03db0c401..5951ea175533 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ static void xe_oa_stream_destroy(struct xe_oa_stream *stream)
>
> xe_oa_free_oa_buffer(stream);
>
> - XE_WARN_ON(xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL));
> + xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> xe_pm_runtime_put(stream->oa->xe);
>
> /* Wa_1509372804:pvc: Unset the override of GUCRC mode to enable rc6 */
> @@ -1353,6 +1353,7 @@ static int xe_oa_stream_init(struct xe_oa_stream *stream,
> {
> struct xe_oa_unit *u = param->hwe->oa_unit;
> struct xe_gt *gt = param->hwe->gt;
> + unsigned int fw_ref;
> int ret;
>
> stream->exec_q = param->exec_q;
> @@ -1413,7 +1414,11 @@ static int xe_oa_stream_init(struct xe_oa_stream *stream,
>
> /* Take runtime pm ref and forcewake to disable RC6 */
> xe_pm_runtime_get(stream->oa->xe);
> - XE_WARN_ON(xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL));
> + fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> + if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL)) {
> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + goto err_fw_put;
> + }
>
> ret = xe_oa_alloc_oa_buffer(stream);
> if (ret)
> @@ -1455,7 +1460,7 @@ static int xe_oa_stream_init(struct xe_oa_stream *stream,
> err_free_oa_buf:
> xe_oa_free_oa_buffer(stream);
> err_fw_put:
> - XE_WARN_ON(xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL));
> + xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
> xe_pm_runtime_put(stream->oa->xe);
> if (stream->override_gucrc)
> xe_gt_WARN_ON(gt, xe_guc_pc_unset_gucrc_mode(>->uc.guc.pc));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-15 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-14 7:55 [PATCH v9 00/26] Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-14 7:44 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev10) Patchwork
2024-10-14 7:44 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-14 7:46 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 01/26] drm/xe: Add member initialized_domains to xe_force_wake() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 02/26] drm/xe/forcewake: Change awake_domain datatype Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 03/26] drm/xe/forcewake: Add a helper xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 04/26] drm/xe: Error handling in xe_force_wake_get() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-14 8:32 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 05/26] drm/xe: Modify xe_force_wake_put to handle _get returned mask Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-14 8:52 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 06/26] drm/xe/device: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 13:28 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-15 14:35 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 07/26] drm/xe/hdcp: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 13:29 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 08/26] drm/xe/gsc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 13:57 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 09/26] drm/xe/gt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 14:24 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-15 14:44 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 10/26] drm/xe/xe_gt_idle: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 14:25 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 11/26] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 14:26 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-15 16:06 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 12/26] drm/xe/tests/mocs: Update xe_force_wake_get() return handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 14:47 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-15 16:08 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 13/26] drm/xe/mocs: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:09 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-15 17:59 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 14/26] drm/xe/xe_drm_client: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:17 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-15 18:00 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 15/26] drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:18 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-15 18:09 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 16/26] drm/xe/guc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:20 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-15 18:32 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 17/26] drm/xe/huc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:21 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-15 18:20 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-15 18:42 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 18/26] drm/xe/oa: Handle force_wake_get failure in xe_oa_stream_init() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:21 ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2024-10-16 12:34 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 19/26] drm/xe/pat: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:28 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-16 12:35 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 20/26] drm/xe/gt_tlb_invalidation_ggtt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:29 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-16 12:36 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 21/26] drm/xe/xe_reg_sr: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:30 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-16 12:38 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 22/26] drm/xe/query: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:31 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-16 12:40 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 23/26] drm/xe/vram: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:34 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-16 12:41 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14 7:55 ` [PATCH v9 24/26] drm/xe: forcewake debugfs open fails on xe_forcewake_get failure Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 16:02 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14 7:56 ` [PATCH v9 25/26] drm/xe: Ensure __must_check for xe_force_wake_get() return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-14 8:57 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-14 7:56 ` [PATCH v9 26/26] drm/xe: Change return type to void for xe_force_wake_put Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-14 9:00 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-14 7:57 ` ✓ CI.Build: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev10) Patchwork
2024-10-14 7:59 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-14 8:01 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-14 8:27 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-10-14 9:25 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-17 5:40 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev11) Patchwork
2024-10-17 5:40 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-17 5:42 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-10-17 5:53 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 5:55 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 5:57 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 6:20 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 15:42 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0dc6be1f-a9bd-445e-a714-b0e7c321803e@linux.intel.com \
--to=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.