All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
To: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/26] drm/xe/tests/mocs: Update xe_force_wake_get() return handling
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 16:47:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f5faee4-a472-453f-96cc-004e6b1e603c@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241014075601.2324382-13-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>


On 10/14/2024 9:55 AM, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
> With xe_force_wake_get() now returning the refcount-incremented domain
> mask, a return value of 0 indicates failure for single domains.
> Change assert condition to incorporate this change in return and
> pass the return value to xe_force_wake_put()
>
> v3
> - return xe_wakeref_t instead of int in xe_force_wake_get()
>
> v5
> - return unsigned int for xe_force_wake_get()
>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c | 18 ++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c
> index ea932c051cc7..6f9b7a266b41 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c
> @@ -43,12 +43,11 @@ static void read_l3cc_table(struct xe_gt *gt,
>  {
>  	struct kunit *test = kunit_get_current_test();
>  	u32 l3cc, l3cc_expected;
> -	unsigned int i;
> +	unsigned int fw_ref, i;
>  	u32 reg_val;
> -	u32 ret;
>  
> -	ret = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> -	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, ret, 0, "Forcewake Failed.\n");
> +	fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NE_MSG(test, fw_ref, 0, "Forcewake Failed.\n");
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < info->num_mocs_regs; i++) {
>  		if (!(i & 1)) {
> @@ -72,7 +71,7 @@ static void read_l3cc_table(struct xe_gt *gt,
>  		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, l3cc_expected, l3cc,
>  				    "l3cc idx=%u has incorrect val.\n", i);
>  	}
> -	xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> +	xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
>  }
>  
>  static void read_mocs_table(struct xe_gt *gt,
> @@ -80,15 +79,14 @@ static void read_mocs_table(struct xe_gt *gt,
>  {
>  	struct kunit *test = kunit_get_current_test();
>  	u32 mocs, mocs_expected;
> -	unsigned int i;
> +	unsigned int fw_ref, i;
>  	u32 reg_val;
> -	u32 ret;
>  
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE_MSG(test, info->unused_entries_index,
>  			      "Unused entries index should have been defined\n");
>  
> -	ret = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> -	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, ret, 0, "Forcewake Failed.\n");
> +	fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NE_MSG(test, fw_ref, 0, "Forcewake Failed.\n");
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < info->num_mocs_regs; i++) {
>  		if (regs_are_mcr(gt))
> @@ -106,7 +104,7 @@ static void read_mocs_table(struct xe_gt *gt,
>  				    "mocs reg 0x%x has incorrect val.\n", i);
>  	}
>  
> -	xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> +	xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
>  }
>  
>  static int mocs_kernel_test_run_device(struct xe_device *xe)

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-15 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-14  7:55 [PATCH v9 00/26] Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-14  7:44 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev10) Patchwork
2024-10-14  7:44 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-14  7:46 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 01/26] drm/xe: Add member initialized_domains to xe_force_wake() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 02/26] drm/xe/forcewake: Change awake_domain datatype Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 03/26] drm/xe/forcewake: Add a helper xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 04/26] drm/xe: Error handling in xe_force_wake_get() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-14  8:32   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 05/26] drm/xe: Modify xe_force_wake_put to handle _get returned mask Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-14  8:52   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 06/26] drm/xe/device: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 13:28   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-15 14:35   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 07/26] drm/xe/hdcp: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 13:29   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 08/26] drm/xe/gsc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 13:57   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 09/26] drm/xe/gt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 14:24   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-15 14:44   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 10/26] drm/xe/xe_gt_idle: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 14:25   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 11/26] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 14:26   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-15 16:06   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 12/26] drm/xe/tests/mocs: Update xe_force_wake_get() return handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 14:47   ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2024-10-15 16:08   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 13/26] drm/xe/mocs: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:09   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-15 17:59   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 14/26] drm/xe/xe_drm_client: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:17   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-15 18:00   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 15/26] drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:18   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-15 18:09   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 16/26] drm/xe/guc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:20   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-15 18:32   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 17/26] drm/xe/huc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:21   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-15 18:20   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-15 18:42   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 18/26] drm/xe/oa: Handle force_wake_get failure in xe_oa_stream_init() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:21   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-16 12:34   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 19/26] drm/xe/pat: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:28   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-16 12:35   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 20/26] drm/xe/gt_tlb_invalidation_ggtt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:29   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-16 12:36   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 21/26] drm/xe/xe_reg_sr: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:30   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-16 12:38   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 22/26] drm/xe/query: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:31   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-16 12:40   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 23/26] drm/xe/vram: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 15:34   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-16 12:41   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14  7:55 ` [PATCH v9 24/26] drm/xe: forcewake debugfs open fails on xe_forcewake_get failure Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-15 16:02   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-14  7:56 ` [PATCH v9 25/26] drm/xe: Ensure __must_check for xe_force_wake_get() return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-14  8:57   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-14  7:56 ` [PATCH v9 26/26] drm/xe: Change return type to void for xe_force_wake_put Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-14  9:00   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-14  7:57 ` ✓ CI.Build: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev10) Patchwork
2024-10-14  7:59 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-14  8:01 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-14  8:27 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-10-14  9:25 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-17  5:40 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev11) Patchwork
2024-10-17  5:40 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-17  5:42 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-10-17  5:53 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-17  5:55 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-17  5:57 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-17  6:20 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 15:42 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3f5faee4-a472-453f-96cc-004e6b1e603c@linux.intel.com \
    --to=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.