RE: [PATCH 07/10] dt-bindings: phy: Add PHY bindings support for FSD SoC

["Shradha Todi" <shradha.t@samsung.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Sent: 21 May 2025 15:03
> To: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@samsung.com>
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.or;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org; lpieralisi@kernel.org;
> kw@linux.com; robh@kernel.org; bhelgaas@google.com; jingoohan1@gmail.com; krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org;
> alim.akhtar@samsung.com; vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; arnd@arndb.de; m.szyprowski@samsung.com;
> jh80.chung@samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] dt-bindings: phy: Add PHY bindings support for FSD SoC
> 
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 01:01:49AM GMT, Shradha Todi wrote:
> > Document PHY device tree bindings for Tesla FSD SoCs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,exynos-pcie-phy.yaml  | 8
> > ++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,exynos-pcie-phy.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,exynos-pcie-phy.yaml
> > index 41df8bb08ff7..3a5bff0fb82d 100644
> > ---
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,exynos-pcie-phy.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,exynos-pcie-phy.ya
> > +++ ml
> > @@ -15,10 +15,14 @@ properties:
> >      const: 0
> >
> >    compatible:
> > -    const: samsung,exynos5433-pcie-phy
> > +    oneOf:
> 
> Drop, that's just enumm unless you already add here more?
> 
> > +      - enum:
> > +          - samsung,exynos5433-pcie-phy
> > +          - tesla,fsd-pcie-phy
> >
> >    reg:
> > -    maxItems: 1
> > +    minItems: 1
> > +    maxItems: 2
> 
> You need to list the items and constrain existing variants. I do not get why exynos5433 gets now two MMIO ranges.
> 

Will constraint both variants with if - else

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof