* [ALSA - driver 0001538]: Latency was better on earlier version
@ 2005-11-09 20:01 bugtrack
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugtrack @ 2005-11-09 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alsa-devel
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
======================================================================
<https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=1538>
======================================================================
Reported By: pesalomo
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: ALSA - driver
Issue ID: 1538
Category: PCI - intel8x0
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: new
Distribution: Gentoo Linux
Kernel Version: 2.6.14
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 11-09-2005 21:01 CET
Last Modified: 11-09-2005 21:01 CET
======================================================================
Summary: Latency was better on earlier version
Description:
I don't know what category which is best for this - but I'm comparing Linux
kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.14.
Using I82801DBICH4, version 1.0.10rc1, which is bundled with Linux 2.6.14
- the performance is much weaker than when using kernel 2.6.10 (don't
remember the driver version there).
On 2.6.10 I was able to use a buffer size down to 128 bytes, but now the
lowest I can go is 512. And the sound is still crispy.
======================================================================
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo New Issue
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo Distribution => Gentoo Linux
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo Kernel Version => 2.6.14
======================================================================
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [ALSA - driver 0001538]: Latency was better on earlier version
@ 2005-11-10 7:57 bugtrack
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugtrack @ 2005-11-10 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alsa-devel
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
<https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=1538>
======================================================================
Reported By: pesalomo
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: ALSA - driver
Issue ID: 1538
Category: PCI - intel8x0
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: new
Distribution: Gentoo Linux
Kernel Version: 2.6.14
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 11-09-2005 21:01 CET
Last Modified: 11-10-2005 08:57 CET
======================================================================
Summary: Latency was better on earlier version
Description:
I don't know what category which is best for this - but I'm comparing Linux
kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.14.
Using I82801DBICH4, version 1.0.10rc1, which is bundled with Linux 2.6.14
- the performance is much weaker than when using kernel 2.6.10 (don't
remember the driver version there).
On 2.6.10 I was able to use a buffer size down to 128 bytes, but now the
lowest I can go is 512. And the sound is still crispy.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clemens Ladisch - 11-10-05 08:57
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The driver's buffer size didn't change.
What is the output of "aplay -D hw:0 -v --period-size=32 --buffer-size=64
-t raw -f dat /dev/zero"?
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo New Issue
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo Distribution => Gentoo Linux
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo Kernel Version => 2.6.14
11-09-05 21:02 pesalomo Issue Monitored: pesalomo
11-10-05 08:57 Clemens LadischNote Added: 0006660
======================================================================
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [ALSA - driver 0001538]: Latency was better on earlier version
@ 2005-11-10 18:11 bugtrack
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugtrack @ 2005-11-10 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alsa-devel
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
<https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=1538>
======================================================================
Reported By: pesalomo
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: ALSA - driver
Issue ID: 1538
Category: PCI - intel8x0
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: new
Distribution: Gentoo Linux
Kernel Version: 2.6.14
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 11-09-2005 21:01 CET
Last Modified: 11-10-2005 19:11 CET
======================================================================
Summary: Latency was better on earlier version
Description:
I don't know what category which is best for this - but I'm comparing Linux
kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.14.
Using I82801DBICH4, version 1.0.10rc1, which is bundled with Linux 2.6.14
- the performance is much weaker than when using kernel 2.6.10 (don't
remember the driver version there).
On 2.6.10 I was able to use a buffer size down to 128 bytes, but now the
lowest I can go is 512. And the sound is still crispy.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clemens Ladisch - 11-10-05 08:57
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The driver's buffer size didn't change.
What is the output of "aplay -D hw:0 -v --period-size=32 --buffer-size=64
-t raw -f dat /dev/zero"?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
pesalomo - 11-10-05 19:11
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is some of the output of "aplay -D hw:0 -v --period-size=32
--buffer-size=64 -t raw -f dat /dev/zero" using kernel 2.6.14
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.600730000
tstamp : 1131646180.600815000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 2.237 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.617336000
tstamp : 1131646180.619571000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 0.033 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.632774000
tstamp : 1131646180.632805000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 1.898 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.634022000
tstamp : 1131646180.635918000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 0.191 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.637126000
tstamp : 1131646180.637316000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 1.944 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.653834000
tstamp : 1131646180.655776000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 1.959 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.669669000
tstamp : 1131646180.671626000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 2.220 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.685502000
tstamp : 1131646180.687720000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 1.991 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.701584000
tstamp : 1131646180.703573000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 2.132 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.717439000
tstamp : 1131646180.719569000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 2.060 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.733440000
tstamp : 1131646180.735498000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 2.118 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.749384000
tstamp : 1131646180.751500000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 0.105 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.764712000
tstamp : 1131646180.764815000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 1.782 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.766023000
tstamp : 1131646180.767804000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 0.120 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.769001000
tstamp : 1131646180.769119000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 1.813 ms long)
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo New Issue
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo Distribution => Gentoo Linux
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo Kernel Version => 2.6.14
11-09-05 21:02 pesalomo Issue Monitored: pesalomo
11-10-05 08:57 Clemens LadischNote Added: 0006660
11-10-05 19:11 pesalomo Note Added: 0006668
======================================================================
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [ALSA - driver 0001538]: Latency was better on earlier version
@ 2005-11-10 20:11 bugtrack
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugtrack @ 2005-11-10 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alsa-devel
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
<https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=1538>
======================================================================
Reported By: pesalomo
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: ALSA - driver
Issue ID: 1538
Category: PCI - intel8x0
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: new
Distribution: Gentoo Linux
Kernel Version: 2.6.14
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 11-09-2005 21:01 CET
Last Modified: 11-10-2005 21:11 CET
======================================================================
Summary: Latency was better on earlier version
Description:
I don't know what category which is best for this - but I'm comparing Linux
kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.14.
Using I82801DBICH4, version 1.0.10rc1, which is bundled with Linux 2.6.14
- the performance is much weaker than when using kernel 2.6.10 (don't
remember the driver version there).
On 2.6.10 I was able to use a buffer size down to 128 bytes, but now the
lowest I can go is 512. And the sound is still crispy.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
pesalomo - 11-10-05 19:11
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is some of the output of "aplay -D hw:0 -v --period-size=32
--buffer-size=64 -t raw -f dat /dev/zero" using kernel 2.6.14
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.600730000
tstamp : 1131646180.600815000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 2.237 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.617336000
tstamp : 1131646180.619571000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 0.033 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.632774000
tstamp : 1131646180.632805000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 1.898 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.634022000
tstamp : 1131646180.635918000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 0.191 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.637126000
tstamp : 1131646180.637316000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 1.944 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.653834000
tstamp : 1131646180.655776000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 1.959 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.669669000
tstamp : 1131646180.671626000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 2.220 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.685502000
tstamp : 1131646180.687720000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 1.991 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.701584000
tstamp : 1131646180.703573000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 2.132 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.717439000
tstamp : 1131646180.719569000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 2.060 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.733440000
tstamp : 1131646180.735498000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 2.118 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.749384000
tstamp : 1131646180.751500000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 0.105 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.764712000
tstamp : 1131646180.764815000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 1.782 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.766023000
tstamp : 1131646180.767804000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 0.120 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131646180.769001000
tstamp : 1131646180.769119000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 1.813 ms long)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clemens Ladisch - 11-10-05 21:11
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wanted to see the beginning of the output. But the "avail" values show
that the buffer has a size of 64 frames.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo New Issue
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo Distribution => Gentoo Linux
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo Kernel Version => 2.6.14
11-09-05 21:02 pesalomo Issue Monitored: pesalomo
11-10-05 08:57 Clemens LadischNote Added: 0006660
11-10-05 19:11 pesalomo Note Added: 0006668
11-10-05 21:11 Clemens LadischNote Added: 0006671
======================================================================
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [ALSA - driver 0001538]: Latency was better on earlier version
@ 2005-11-10 20:55 bugtrack
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugtrack @ 2005-11-10 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alsa-devel
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
<https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=1538>
======================================================================
Reported By: pesalomo
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: ALSA - driver
Issue ID: 1538
Category: PCI - intel8x0
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: new
Distribution: Gentoo Linux
Kernel Version: 2.6.14
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 11-09-2005 21:01 CET
Last Modified: 11-10-2005 21:55 CET
======================================================================
Summary: Latency was better on earlier version
Description:
I don't know what category which is best for this - but I'm comparing Linux
kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.14.
Using I82801DBICH4, version 1.0.10rc1, which is bundled with Linux 2.6.14
- the performance is much weaker than when using kernel 2.6.10 (don't
remember the driver version there).
On 2.6.10 I was able to use a buffer size down to 128 bytes, but now the
lowest I can go is 512. And the sound is still crispy.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clemens Ladisch - 11-10-05 21:11
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wanted to see the beginning of the output. But the "avail" values show
that the buffer has a size of 64 frames.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
pesalomo - 11-10-05 21:55
----------------------------------------------------------------------
aplay -D hw:0 -v --period-size=32 --buffer-size=64 -t raw -f dat /dev/zero
Playing raw data '/dev/zero' : Signed 16 bit Little Endian, Rate 48000 Hz,
Stereo
Hardware PCM card 0 'Intel 82801DB-ICH4' device 0 subdevice 0
Its setup is:
stream : PLAYBACK
access : RW_INTERLEAVED
format : S16_LE
subformat : STD
channels : 2
rate : 48000
exact rate : 48000 (48000/1)
msbits : 16
buffer_size : 64
period_size : 32
period_time : 666
tick_time : 4000
tstamp_mode : NONE
period_step : 1
sleep_min : 0
avail_min : 32
xfer_align : 32
start_threshold : 64
stop_threshold : 64
silence_threshold: 0
silence_size : 0
boundary : 1073741824
underrun!!! (at least 8.179 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131656091.89497000
tstamp : 1131656091.97657000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 18.193 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131656091.113515000
tstamp : 1131656091.131707000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 0.243 ms long)
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo New Issue
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo Distribution => Gentoo Linux
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo Kernel Version => 2.6.14
11-09-05 21:02 pesalomo Issue Monitored: pesalomo
11-10-05 08:57 Clemens LadischNote Added: 0006660
11-10-05 19:11 pesalomo Note Added: 0006668
11-10-05 21:11 Clemens LadischNote Added: 0006671
11-10-05 21:55 pesalomo Note Added: 0006673
======================================================================
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [ALSA - driver 0001538]: Latency was better on earlier version
@ 2005-11-22 15:18 bugtrack
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugtrack @ 2005-11-22 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alsa-devel
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
<https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=1538>
======================================================================
Reported By: pesalomo
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: ALSA - driver
Issue ID: 1538
Category: PCI - intel8x0
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: new
Distribution: Gentoo Linux
Kernel Version: 2.6.14
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 11-09-2005 21:01 CET
Last Modified: 11-22-2005 16:18 CET
======================================================================
Summary: Latency was better on earlier version
Description:
I don't know what category which is best for this - but I'm comparing Linux
kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.14.
Using I82801DBICH4, version 1.0.10rc1, which is bundled with Linux 2.6.14
- the performance is much weaker than when using kernel 2.6.10 (don't
remember the driver version there).
On 2.6.10 I was able to use a buffer size down to 128 bytes, but now the
lowest I can go is 512. And the sound is still crispy.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
pesalomo - 11-10-05 21:55
----------------------------------------------------------------------
aplay -D hw:0 -v --period-size=32 --buffer-size=64 -t raw -f dat /dev/zero
Playing raw data '/dev/zero' : Signed 16 bit Little Endian, Rate 48000 Hz,
Stereo
Hardware PCM card 0 'Intel 82801DB-ICH4' device 0 subdevice 0
Its setup is:
stream : PLAYBACK
access : RW_INTERLEAVED
format : S16_LE
subformat : STD
channels : 2
rate : 48000
exact rate : 48000 (48000/1)
msbits : 16
buffer_size : 64
period_size : 32
period_time : 666
tick_time : 4000
tstamp_mode : NONE
period_step : 1
sleep_min : 0
avail_min : 32
xfer_align : 32
start_threshold : 64
stop_threshold : 64
silence_threshold: 0
silence_size : 0
boundary : 1073741824
underrun!!! (at least 8.179 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131656091.89497000
tstamp : 1131656091.97657000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 18.193 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131656091.113515000
tstamp : 1131656091.131707000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 0.243 ms long)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
pesalomo - 11-22-05 16:18
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK.. I withdraw this.. The reason for the difference was because of a
kernel parameter Timer frequency. (Under CPU type and features). A
recently added parameter?
I've set this to 1000 Hz and then it's perfect.
Sorry for false alarm.
Peter
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo New Issue
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo Distribution => Gentoo Linux
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo Kernel Version => 2.6.14
11-09-05 21:02 pesalomo Issue Monitored: pesalomo
11-10-05 08:57 Clemens LadischNote Added: 0006660
11-10-05 19:11 pesalomo Note Added: 0006668
11-10-05 21:11 Clemens LadischNote Added: 0006671
11-10-05 21:55 pesalomo Note Added: 0006673
11-22-05 16:18 pesalomo Note Added: 0006787
======================================================================
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [ALSA - driver 0001538]: Latency was better on earlier version
@ 2005-11-23 16:23 bugtrack
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugtrack @ 2005-11-23 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alsa-devel
The following issue has been RESOLVED.
======================================================================
<https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=1538>
======================================================================
Reported By: pesalomo
Assigned To: tiwai
======================================================================
Project: ALSA - driver
Issue ID: 1538
Category: PCI - intel8x0
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: resolved
Distribution: Gentoo Linux
Kernel Version: 2.6.14
Resolution: not an issue
Fixed in Version:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 11-09-2005 21:01 CET
Last Modified: 11-23-2005 17:23 CET
======================================================================
Summary: Latency was better on earlier version
Description:
I don't know what category which is best for this - but I'm comparing Linux
kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.14.
Using I82801DBICH4, version 1.0.10rc1, which is bundled with Linux 2.6.14
- the performance is much weaker than when using kernel 2.6.10 (don't
remember the driver version there).
On 2.6.10 I was able to use a buffer size down to 128 bytes, but now the
lowest I can go is 512. And the sound is still crispy.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
pesalomo - 11-10-05 21:55
----------------------------------------------------------------------
aplay -D hw:0 -v --period-size=32 --buffer-size=64 -t raw -f dat /dev/zero
Playing raw data '/dev/zero' : Signed 16 bit Little Endian, Rate 48000 Hz,
Stereo
Hardware PCM card 0 'Intel 82801DB-ICH4' device 0 subdevice 0
Its setup is:
stream : PLAYBACK
access : RW_INTERLEAVED
format : S16_LE
subformat : STD
channels : 2
rate : 48000
exact rate : 48000 (48000/1)
msbits : 16
buffer_size : 64
period_size : 32
period_time : 666
tick_time : 4000
tstamp_mode : NONE
period_step : 1
sleep_min : 0
avail_min : 32
xfer_align : 32
start_threshold : 64
stop_threshold : 64
silence_threshold: 0
silence_size : 0
boundary : 1073741824
underrun!!! (at least 8.179 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131656091.89497000
tstamp : 1131656091.97657000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 18.193 ms long)
Status:
state : XRUN
trigger_time: 1131656091.113515000
tstamp : 1131656091.131707000
delay : 0
avail : 64
avail_max : 64
underrun!!! (at least 0.243 ms long)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
pesalomo - 11-22-05 16:18
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK.. I withdraw this.. The reason for the difference was because of a
kernel parameter Timer frequency. (Under CPU type and features). A
recently added parameter?
I've set this to 1000 Hz and then it's perfect.
Sorry for false alarm.
Peter
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo New Issue
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo Distribution => Gentoo Linux
11-09-05 21:01 pesalomo Kernel Version => 2.6.14
11-09-05 21:02 pesalomo Issue Monitored: pesalomo
11-10-05 08:57 Clemens LadischNote Added: 0006660
11-10-05 19:11 pesalomo Note Added: 0006668
11-10-05 21:11 Clemens LadischNote Added: 0006671
11-10-05 21:55 pesalomo Note Added: 0006673
11-22-05 16:18 pesalomo Note Added: 0006787
11-23-05 17:23 tiwai Status new => resolved
11-23-05 17:23 tiwai Resolution open => not an issue
11-23-05 17:23 tiwai Assigned To => tiwai
======================================================================
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-23 16:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-22 15:18 [ALSA - driver 0001538]: Latency was better on earlier version bugtrack
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-23 16:23 bugtrack
2005-11-10 20:55 bugtrack
2005-11-10 20:11 bugtrack
2005-11-10 18:11 bugtrack
2005-11-10 7:57 bugtrack
2005-11-09 20:01 bugtrack
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.