From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] New zoned loop block device driver
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 08:38:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f2eea00-e5e9-4cd1-8fe6-89ed0c2b262b@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250106153252.GA27739@lst.de>
On 1/6/25 8:32 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 08:24:06AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> A lot more code where?
>
> Very good and relevant question. Some random new repo that no one knows
> about? Not very helpful. xfstests itself? Maybe, but that would just
> means other users have to fork it.
Why would they have to fork it? Just put it in xfstests itself. These
are very weak reasons, imho.
>> Not in the kernel. And now we're stuck with a new
>> driver for a relatively niche use case. Seems like a bad tradeoff to me.
>
> Seriously, if you can't Damien and me to maintain a little driver
> using completely standard interfaces without any magic you'll have
> different problems keepign the block layer alive :)
Asking "why do we need this driver, when we can accomplish the same with
existing stuff" is a valid question, and I'm a bit puzzled why we can't
just have a reasonable discussion about this. If that simple question
can't be asked, and answered suitably, then something is really amiss.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-06 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-06 14:24 [PATCH 0/2] New zoned loop block device driver Damien Le Moal
2025-01-06 14:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: new " Damien Le Moal
2025-01-06 14:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: Document the " Damien Le Moal
2025-01-06 14:54 ` [PATCH 0/2] New " Jens Axboe
2025-01-06 15:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 15:24 ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-06 15:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 15:38 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-01-06 15:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 17:38 ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-06 18:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 21:10 ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-08 5:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 1:08 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-07 21:08 ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-08 5:11 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-08 5:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 2:47 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08 14:10 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-01-08 2:29 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08 5:06 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-08 8:13 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08 9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 9:39 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-10 12:34 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-24 9:30 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-24 12:30 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-24 14:20 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-29 8:10 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-31 3:54 ` Ming Lei
2025-02-04 3:22 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-02-05 3:43 ` Ming Lei
2025-02-05 6:07 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-02-06 3:24 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08 5:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f2eea00-e5e9-4cd1-8fe6-89ed0c2b262b@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.