From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Arjan Filius <iafilius@xs4all.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Feedback on preemptible kernel patch
Date: 09 Sep 2001 00:40:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1000010407.840.35.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109081920540.3542-100000@sjoerd.sjoerdnet>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109081920540.3542-100000@sjoerd.sjoerdnet>
On Sat, 2001-09-08 at 13:33, Arjan Filius wrote:
> I tried 2.4.10-pre4 with patch-rml-2.4.10-pre4-preempt-kernel-1.
> But it seems to hit highmem (see below) (i do have 1.5GB ram)
> 2.4.10-pre4 plain runs just fine.
going through this thread and now looking at the highmem code, it is
clear highmem is not going to be preempt safe.
until Nigel or I (or someone?) can go through it all and add appropriate
locks, its a bomb waiting to blow.
thank you for the feedback...stay tuned.
--
Robert M. Love
rml at ufl.edu
rml at tech9.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-09 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-08 5:22 Feedback on preemptible kernel patch grue
2001-09-08 5:47 ` Robert Love
2001-09-08 17:33 ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-08 18:22 ` safemode
2001-09-08 20:58 ` [SMP lock BUG?] " Roger Larsson
2001-09-08 20:58 ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-08 22:18 ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-08 22:18 ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-09 14:55 ` george anzinger
2001-09-09 14:55 ` george anzinger
2001-09-09 22:25 ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-09 22:25 ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-09 4:40 ` Robert Love [this message]
2001-09-09 17:09 ` Robert Love
2001-09-09 21:07 ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-09 21:26 ` Robert Love
2001-09-09 21:23 ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-09 21:37 ` Robert Love
2001-09-10 3:24 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-10 3:37 ` Jeremy Zawodny
2001-09-10 5:09 ` Robert Love
2001-09-10 18:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-10 21:29 ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-13 17:27 ` Robert Love
2001-09-14 7:30 ` george anzinger
2001-09-14 15:01 ` Robert Love
2001-09-11 19:47 ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-09 18:57 ` grue
2001-09-09 21:44 ` Robert Love
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-11 22:53 Robert Love
2001-09-14 2:47 Dieter Nützel
[not found] <200109140302.f8E32LG13400@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-14 4:35 ` Robert Love
2001-09-15 4:25 ` Dieter Nützel
[not found] ` <200109150444.f8F4iEG19063@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-15 5:14 ` Robert Love
2001-09-18 4:06 ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-18 8:35 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-18 18:18 ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-18 23:31 ` Robert Love
2001-09-20 6:40 ` Dieter Nützel
[not found] ` <200109180406.f8I46LG02238@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-18 23:31 ` Robert Love
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109140838040.21992-100000@sjoerd.sjoerdnet>
2001-09-14 15:04 ` Robert Love
2001-09-15 9:44 ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-15 10:38 ` Erik Mouw
2001-09-15 17:57 ` Robert Love
2001-09-15 19:18 Robert Love
2001-09-16 1:28 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-16 1:54 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1000010407.840.35.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=iafilius@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.