All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <rml@ufl.edu>
To: Roger Larsson <roger.larsson@norran.net>
Cc: "Dieter Nützel" <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>,
	"Linux Kernel List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Feedback on preemptible kernel patch
Date: 18 Sep 2001 19:31:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1000855890.19833.51.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200109181822.f8IIMv618968@mailg.telia.com>
In-Reply-To: <200109140302.f8E32LG13400@zero.tech9.net> <1000530869.32365.21.camel@phantasy> <20010918040550Z273827-761+10122@vger.kernel.org>  <200109181822.f8IIMv618968@mailg.telia.com>

On Tue, 2001-09-18 at 14:18, Roger Larsson wrote:
> Do you run with the playback process reniced -N?
> It should really run with a low SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RT policy.
> But renicing it with a negative value gives some of the benefits...
> (but you need to run as root)
> In addition to this the program might need to lock its pages down - the
> only thing I can think of that could cause several seconds delay would
> be if it has been swapped out...

Certainly giving it a higher priority should improve results (especially
with preemption), but the application should receive a fair amount of
process attention as it is, as it is TASK_RUNNABLE at all times and the
disk I/O should be routinely preempted.  I am interested how much
renicing it helps, though.

Now, if it has to swap pages, that is a very good point.  I tend to
blame this, or perhaps something with a long held lock (the audio
driver?) for the blips.

Its so hard to tell swap/VM issues now with all the VM work, sadly...:)

-- 
Robert M. Love
rml at ufl.edu
rml at tech9.net


  reply	other threads:[~2001-09-18 23:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200109140302.f8E32LG13400@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-14  4:35 ` Feedback on preemptible kernel patch Robert Love
2001-09-15  4:25   ` Dieter Nützel
     [not found]   ` <200109150444.f8F4iEG19063@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-15  5:14     ` Robert Love
2001-09-18  4:06       ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-18  8:35         ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-18 18:18         ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-18 23:31           ` Robert Love [this message]
2001-09-20  6:40             ` Dieter Nützel
     [not found]       ` <200109180406.f8I46LG02238@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-18 23:31         ` Robert Love
2001-09-15 19:18 Robert Love
2001-09-16  1:28 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-16  1:54   ` Daniel Phillips
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109140838040.21992-100000@sjoerd.sjoerdnet>
2001-09-14 15:04 ` Robert Love
2001-09-15  9:44   ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-15 10:38     ` Erik Mouw
2001-09-15 17:57     ` Robert Love
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-14  2:47 Dieter Nützel
2001-09-11 22:53 Robert Love
2001-09-08  5:22 grue
2001-09-08  5:47 ` Robert Love
2001-09-08 17:33   ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-08 18:22     ` safemode
2001-09-09  4:40     ` Robert Love
2001-09-09 17:09       ` Robert Love
2001-09-09 21:07         ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-09 21:26           ` Robert Love
2001-09-09 21:23         ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-09 21:37           ` Robert Love
2001-09-10  3:24             ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-10  3:37               ` Jeremy Zawodny
2001-09-10  5:09               ` Robert Love
2001-09-10 18:25                 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-10 21:29                 ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-13 17:27                   ` Robert Love
2001-09-14  7:30                     ` george anzinger
2001-09-14 15:01                       ` Robert Love
2001-09-11 19:47             ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-09 18:57   ` grue
2001-09-09 21:44     ` Robert Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1000855890.19833.51.camel@phantasy \
    --to=rml@ufl.edu \
    --cc=Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roger.larsson@norran.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.