From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: szonyi calin <caszonyi@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] updated preempt-kernel
Date: 22 Oct 2001 19:03:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1003791816.1712.55.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011022144601.55173.qmail@web13103.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20011022144601.55173.qmail@web13103.mail.yahoo.com>
On Mon, 2001-10-22 at 10:46, szonyi calin wrote:
> Hi
> I'm using the preemptible kernel patch since 2.4.10
> (no 2.4.11). And it makes a big difference on 486 with
> 12Megs of ram.
> I can't send you benchmarks (i don't have time for
> this but if you really want one ... it can be arranged
> :-)).
> But:
>
> When I run a configure script I can actually see it
> running (without this patch it is very slow).
>
> The coolest thing was that I could run Gnome and KDE
> (with loadavg of 4 and waiting 2 to 4 minutes for an
> application to start (because of ram I think))
> something not possible without the preemtible kernel.
> I don't swear after them anyway.( I prefer fvwm)
>
> Compilation is much faster (i'll make a benchmark
> compiling linux kernel -- i promise :-)) ).
I am very glad to here this -- thank you :)
I'm glad it works so good.
> The system is stable with high system loads.
> Now is kernel 2.4.12 and no problems at all.
>
> Any chance to be in the main stable kernel ?
Hopefully for 2.5.
> Bye
Robert Love
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-22 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-20 7:27 [PATCH] updated preempt-kernel Robert Love
2001-10-20 12:44 ` elko
2001-10-22 20:43 ` elko
2001-10-22 23:11 ` Robert Love
2001-10-23 15:13 ` elko
2001-10-23 15:40 ` Andre's PDC20269 support patch? J.R. de Jong
2001-10-20 12:59 ` [PATCH] updated preempt-kernel Lorenzo Allegrucci
2001-10-20 17:02 ` Robert Love
2001-10-22 15:32 ` bill davidsen
2001-10-22 18:39 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-22 23:08 ` Robert Love
2001-10-21 11:05 ` Colin Phipps
2001-10-21 15:24 ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-21 18:16 ` Robert Love
2001-10-22 15:36 ` Taral
2001-10-21 18:23 ` Federico Sevilla III
2001-10-22 8:27 ` Jesper Juhl
2001-10-22 14:46 ` szonyi calin
2001-10-22 23:03 ` Robert Love [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1003791816.1712.55.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=caszonyi@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.