From: Kenneth Johansson <ken@canit.se>
To: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
Cc: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Subject: Re: KBuild 2.5 Impressions
Date: 30 May 2002 16:08:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1022767735.4032.5.camel@tiger> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CF62020.2030704@evision-ventures.com>
On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 14:50, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
>
> > Along the way, old kbuild did the usual wrong things:
> >
> > - In the incremental build, 6 files rebuilt that should not have been
> >
> > - Once, when I interrupted the make dep, subsequent make deps would
> > no longer work, forcing me to do make mrproper and start again.
> >
> > - Way too much output to the screen
>
> Bull shit: make -s helps.
In that case it's way to little. In kbuild2.5 it's actually easy to spot
if the correct files get compiled after a change.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-30 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-30 9:45 KBuild 2.5 Impressions Daniel Phillips
2002-05-30 12:50 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-30 14:08 ` Kenneth Johansson [this message]
2002-05-30 13:28 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-05-30 21:55 ` Ion Badulescu
2002-05-30 22:29 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-05-30 23:19 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-31 0:09 ` David Lang
2002-05-31 0:29 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-31 0:32 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-03 7:21 ` Rusty Russell
2002-05-31 0:13 ` Kenneth Johansson
2002-05-31 0:47 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-31 1:20 ` Skip Ford
2002-05-31 1:24 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-31 13:48 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-31 14:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-31 15:21 ` Thunder from the hill
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205302129120.29405-100000@hawkeye.luckynet.adm>
2002-05-31 4:01 ` Skip Ford
2002-05-31 4:46 ` KBuild 2.5 Migration Daniel Phillips
2002-05-31 5:12 ` Skip Ford
2002-05-31 0:48 ` KBuild 2.5 Impressions Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-31 3:29 ` Hua Zhong
2002-05-31 3:39 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-31 3:55 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-02 4:03 ` Ion Badulescu
2002-06-02 6:51 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-02 7:58 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-02 14:03 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-06-02 14:38 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-02 14:56 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-06-02 15:05 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-02 15:16 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-02 18:26 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-06-02 18:39 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-02 18:57 ` Ion Badulescu
2002-06-02 19:15 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-03 2:04 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-06-02 15:47 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-02 11:21 ` Peter Osterlund
2002-06-02 11:37 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-02 11:53 ` Peter Osterlund
2002-06-02 12:03 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-02 12:09 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-02 12:51 ` Peter Osterlund
2002-06-02 14:00 ` Daniel Phillips
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-03 2:49 Dan Kegel
2002-06-03 3:28 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1022767735.4032.5.camel@tiger \
--to=ken@canit.se \
--cc=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.