Fsck over Telnet is slow.

Fsck over Telnet is slow.

[Anders Widman]

   Is  it just me, but I think reiserfsck is slow over telnet, or even
   slower   over  ssh. It seems as it would be better to not print the
   progress as fast, if the connection to the terminal is slow.

   Of course, I could use a log file instead.

   //Anders

Re: Fsck over Telnet is slow.

[Andreas Dilger]

On May 31, 2002  10:21 +0200, Anders Widman wrote:
>    Is  it just me, but I think reiserfsck is slow over telnet, or even
>    slower   over  ssh. It seems as it would be better to not print the
>    progress as fast, if the connection to the terminal is slow.

e2fsck used to have the same problem when you enabled the "progress
meter".  What it does now is only update the progress on the screen
every 10th of a second (or whatever) by checking how long ago the last 
update was.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/

Re: Fsck over Telnet is slow.

[Adrian Phillips]

>>>>> "Anders" == Anders Widman <andewid@tnonline.net> writes:

    Anders>    Is it just me, but I think reiserfsck is slow over
    Anders> telnet, or even slower over ssh. It seems as it would be
    Anders> better to not print the progress as fast, if the
    Anders> connection to the terminal is slow.

    Anders>    Of course, I could use a log file instead.

Try with -q (I think) instead,

Sincerely,

Adrian Phillips

-- 
Your mouse has moved.
Windows NT must be restarted for the change to take effect.
Reboot now?  [OK]

Re: Fsck over Telnet is slow.

[Chris Mason]

On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 05:59, Adrian Phillips wrote:
> >>>>> "Anders" == Anders Widman <andewid@tnonline.net> writes:
> 
>     Anders>    Is it just me, but I think reiserfsck is slow over
>     Anders> telnet, or even slower over ssh. It seems as it would be
>     Anders> better to not print the progress as fast, if the
>     Anders> connection to the terminal is slow.
> 
>     Anders>    Of course, I could use a log file instead.
> 
> Try with -q (I think) instead,

Yes, that works pretty well.  I use it over a serial console without
problems.

-chris

Re[2]: Fsck over Telnet is slow.

[Anders Widman]

Great! I'll try it :)

//Anders


> On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 05:59, Adrian Phillips wrote:
>> >>>>> "Anders" == Anders Widman <andewid@tnonline.net> writes:
>> 
>>     Anders>    Is it just me, but I think reiserfsck is slow over
>>     Anders> telnet, or even slower over ssh. It seems as it would be
>>     Anders> better to not print the progress as fast, if the
>>     Anders> connection to the terminal is slow.
>> 
>>     Anders>    Of course, I could use a log file instead.
>> 
>> Try with -q (I think) instead,

> Yes, that works pretty well.  I use it over a serial console without
> problems.

> -chris