Re: iptables on sparc64 platform?

[Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 727 bytes --]

On Thu, 2002-03-14 at 16:34, Simon Oosthoek wrote:

> The reason I have doubts about the quality of the modules on 64 bit sparc is
> that the iptables command gives an invalid argument error when using the -m
> limit option. The ipt_limit module is in memory (according to lsmod).

Hi Simon, sorry for the very very late reply.

It seems I made a patch for libipt_limit.c when I read this mail but it
seems I never sent it to anyone :( I found it when I was cleaning up a
bit.

Do you still have this problem?
I don't know if this patch will solve the problem but if you want you
can give it a try.

-- 
/Martin

Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat
you with experience.

[-- Attachment #1.2: libipt_limit-diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 392 bytes --]

--- netfilter/userspace/extensions/libipt_limit.c.orig	Tue Jul 30 11:56:40 2002
+++ netfilter/userspace/extensions/libipt_limit.c	Tue Jul 30 11:57:28 2002
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
     "limit",
     IPTABLES_VERSION,
     IPT_ALIGN(sizeof(struct ipt_rateinfo)),
-    offsetof(struct ipt_rateinfo, prev),
+    IPT_ALIGN(sizeof(struct ipt_rateinfo)),
     &help,
     &init,
     &parse,

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]