* Re: iptables on sparc64 platform?
[not found] <20020314153419.GA5152@margo.student.utwente.nl>
@ 2002-09-15 12:58 ` Martin Josefsson
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Martin Josefsson @ 2002-09-15 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon Oosthoek; +Cc: Netfilter-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 727 bytes --]
On Thu, 2002-03-14 at 16:34, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
> The reason I have doubts about the quality of the modules on 64 bit sparc is
> that the iptables command gives an invalid argument error when using the -m
> limit option. The ipt_limit module is in memory (according to lsmod).
Hi Simon, sorry for the very very late reply.
It seems I made a patch for libipt_limit.c when I read this mail but it
seems I never sent it to anyone :( I found it when I was cleaning up a
bit.
Do you still have this problem?
I don't know if this patch will solve the problem but if you want you
can give it a try.
--
/Martin
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat
you with experience.
[-- Attachment #1.2: libipt_limit-diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 392 bytes --]
--- netfilter/userspace/extensions/libipt_limit.c.orig Tue Jul 30 11:56:40 2002
+++ netfilter/userspace/extensions/libipt_limit.c Tue Jul 30 11:57:28 2002
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
"limit",
IPTABLES_VERSION,
IPT_ALIGN(sizeof(struct ipt_rateinfo)),
- offsetof(struct ipt_rateinfo, prev),
+ IPT_ALIGN(sizeof(struct ipt_rateinfo)),
&help,
&init,
&parse,
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread