From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@digeo.com, riel@conectiva.com.br
Subject: [BENCHMARK] contest results for 2.5.36
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 00:46:26 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1032360386.3d8891c2bc3d3@kolivas.net> (raw)
Here are the latest results with 2.5.36 compared with 2.5.34
No Load:
Kernel Time CPU
2.4.19 68.14 99%
2.4.20-pre7 68.11 99%
2.5.34 69.88 99%
2.4.19-ck7 68.40 98%
2.4.19-ck7-rmap 68.73 99%
2.4.19-cc 68.37 99%
2.5.36 69.58 99%
Process Load:
Kernel Time CPU
2.4.19 81.10 80%
2.4.20-pre7 81.92 80%
2.5.34 71.39 94%
2.5.36 71.80 94%
Mem Load:
Kernel Time CPU
2.4.19 92.49 77%
2.4.20-pre7 92.25 77%
2.5.34 138.05 54%
2.5.36 132.45 56%
IO Halfmem Load:
Kernel Time CPU
2.4.19 99.41 70%
2.4.20-pre7 99.42 71%
2.5.34 74.31 93%
2.5.36 94.82 76%
IO Fullmem Load:
Kernel Time CPU
2.4.19 173.00 41%
2.4.20-pre7 146.38 48%
2.5.34 74.00 94%
2.5.36 87.57 81%
The full log for 2.5.34 is:
noload Time: 69.88 CPU: 99% Major Faults: 247874 Minor Faults: 295941
process_load Time: 71.39 CPU: 94% Major Faults: 204811 Minor Faults: 256001
io_halfmem Time: 74.31 CPU: 93% Major Faults: 204019 Minor Faults: 255284
Was writing number 4 of a 112Mb sized io_load file after 76 seconds
io_fullmem Time: 74.00 CPU: 94% Major Faults: 204019 Minor Faults: 255289
Was writing number 2 of a 224Mb sized io_load file after 98 seconds
mem_load Time: 138.05 CPU: 54% Major Faults: 204107 Minor Faults: 255695
and for 2.5.36 is:
noload Time: 69.58 CPU: 99% Major Faults: 242825 Minor Faults: 292307
process_load Time: 71.80 CPU: 94% Major Faults: 205009 Minor Faults: 256150
io_halfmem Time: 94.82 CPU: 76% Major Faults: 204019 Minor Faults: 255214
Was writing number 6 of a 112Mb sized io_load file after 104 seconds
io_fullmem Time: 87.57 CPU: 81% Major Faults: 204019 Minor Faults: 255312
Was writing number 3 of a 224Mb sized io_load file after 119 seconds
mem_load Time: 132.45 CPU: 56% Major Faults: 204115 Minor Faults: 255234
As you can see, going from 2.5.34 to 2.5.36 has had a minor improvement in
response under memory loading, but a drop in response under IO load. The log
shows more was written by the IO load during benchmarking in 2.5.36 The values
are different from the original 2.5.34 results I posted as there was a problem
with the potential for loads overlapping, and doing the memory load before
others made for heavy swapping afterwards.
contest has been upgraded to v0.34 with numerous small changes and a few fixes.
It can be downloaded here:
http://contest.kolivas.net
Comments?
Con.
next reply other threads:[~2002-09-18 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-18 14:46 Con Kolivas [this message]
2002-09-18 16:41 ` [BENCHMARK] contest results for 2.5.36 Andrew Morton
2002-09-18 16:50 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-19 8:05 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-19 8:14 ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-18 21:17 ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-18 21:40 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-18 23:55 ` NMI watchdog stability Jonathan Lundell
2002-09-19 12:07 ` John Levon
2002-09-19 13:20 ` Richard B. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1032360386.3d8891c2bc3d3@kolivas.net \
--to=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.