All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] contest results for 2.5.36
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 18:14:15 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1032423255.3d89875787cb4@kolivas.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E17rwJh-0000vS-00@starship>

Quoting Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>:

> On Wednesday 18 September 2002 18:50, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > > > No Load:
> > > > Kernel                  Time            CPU
> > > > 2.4.19                  68.14           99%
> > > > 2.4.20-pre7             68.11           99%
> > > > 2.5.34                  69.88           99%
> > > > 2.4.19-ck7              68.40           98%
> > > > 2.4.19-ck7-rmap         68.73           99%
> > > > 2.4.19-cc               68.37           99%
> > > > 2.5.36                  69.58           99%
> > >
> > > page_add/remove_rmap.  Be interesting to test an Alan kernel too.
> > 
> > Yes, but why are page_add/remove_rmap slower in 2.5 than in
> > Con's -rmap kernel ? ;)
> 
> I don't know what you guys are going on about, these differences are
> getting close to statistically insignificant.

These ones definitely are insignificant. I've found the limit with repeat
measurements about +/- 1%

Con.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-19  8:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-18 14:46 [BENCHMARK] contest results for 2.5.36 Con Kolivas
2002-09-18 16:41 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-18 16:50   ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-19  8:05     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-19  8:14       ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2002-09-18 21:17   ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-18 21:40     ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-18 23:55       ` NMI watchdog stability Jonathan Lundell
2002-09-19 12:07         ` John Levon
2002-09-19 13:20           ` Richard B. Johnson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1032423255.3d89875787cb4@kolivas.net \
    --to=conman@kolivas.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phillips@arcor.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.