From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
rth@twiddle.net, jakub@redhat.com, torvalds@transmeta.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use __attribute__((malloc)) for gcc 3.2
Date: 07 Oct 2002 13:07:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1033988869.2815.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021007105622.GA24530@averell>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 854 bytes --]
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 12:56, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 12:29:00PM +0200, David S. Miller wrote:
> > From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
> > Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 03:05:41 -0700
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 04:01:13PM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > Does this matter when the kernel is compiled with -fno-strict-aliasing?
> >
> > Yes. The malloc attribute uses REG_NOALIAS, not alias sets.
> >
> > Great, I'm all for Andi's patch in that case.
>
> I retested it on gcc 3.2 and it unfortunately doesn't make any difference
> (resulting kernel is byte-for-byte identical). So it looks like with
> current gcc it isn't worth the effort.
I'm still in favor of doing it, even if it's just to break the
chick-and-egg deadlock that such issues can have.
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-07 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-29 15:27 [PATCH] Use __attribute__((malloc)) for gcc 3.2 Andi Kleen
2002-09-29 16:24 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-09-29 17:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-09-30 0:11 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-30 0:29 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-29 20:01 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-09-30 0:04 ` Andi Kleen
2002-10-07 10:05 ` Richard Henderson
2002-10-07 10:29 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-07 10:56 ` Andi Kleen
2002-10-07 11:07 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2002-10-07 11:45 ` Richard Henderson
2002-10-07 12:27 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-29 23:51 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-09-30 0:31 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-30 1:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-02 13:46 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] <20020929152731.GA10631@averell.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20020929182643.C8564@infradead.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-09-29 19:09 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-29 20:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-09-30 0:21 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1033988869.2815.5.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.