From: Cedric Blancher <blancher@cartel-securite.fr>
To: Antony Stone <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: ICMP conntrack
Date: 18 Oct 2002 11:05:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1034931957.8912.13.camel@elendil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021018082812.QQWL292.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@there>
Le ven 18/10/2002 à 10:28, Antony Stone a écrit :
> > I was wondering why I'm not getting any conntrack entires for icmp
> > connections?
> There is no concept of a "connection" for ICMP.
Yes it's true, but for some, you have a request/reply concept.
> A single ICMP packet is sent to indicate some situation has occurred.
> There's no reply, there's no follow-up packet, therefore there's no need to
> keeptrack of a "connection" for something which consists of only a single
> packet.
Two cases :
request/reply : echo, timestamp, address mask and info
First packet (request) is NEW, others (replies) are
ESTABLISHED ; entries have a 30s timeout.
If a unsolicitated reply is received, then INVALID.
ICMP erros : ICMP payload is a quotation extracted from the IP
packet that has generated the error. This quotation is
used to identify the related session in conntrack table.
If ICMP match an active entry, then it's RELATED. If
not, it's INVALID.
So, for ICMP requests, you have some kind of conntrack, based on ICMP
sequence number. For ICMP errors, conntrack tries to associate them to
an existing entry.
--
Cédric Blancher <blancher@cartel-securite.fr>
Consultant en sécurité des systèmes et réseaux - Cartel Sécurité
Tél: +33 (0)1 44 06 97 87 - Fax: +33 (0)1 44 06 97 99
PGP KeyID:157E98EE FingerPrint:FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-18 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-17 23:27 Rules not taking effect Tib
2002-10-17 23:35 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-18 0:32 ` Rules not taking effect - 2nd try Tib
2002-10-18 2:51 ` ICMP conntrack Vincent Lim
2002-10-18 8:28 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-18 9:05 ` Cedric Blancher [this message]
2002-10-18 9:52 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-18 10:07 ` Vincent Lim
2002-10-18 10:22 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-18 10:54 ` Cedric Blancher
2002-10-18 8:25 ` Rules not taking effect - 2nd try Antony Stone
2002-10-18 9:35 ` Tib
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1034931957.8912.13.camel@elendil \
--to=blancher@cartel-securite.fr \
--cc=Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.