From: Cedric Blancher <blancher@cartel-securite.fr>
To: Antony Stone <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: ICMP conntrack
Date: 18 Oct 2002 12:54:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1034938450.8912.29.camel@elendil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200210180952.g9I9qEL27957@vulcan.rissington.net>
Le ven 18/10/2002 à 11:52, Antony Stone a écrit :
> Although I agree with what you've said here, it's not really relevant
> to the original poster's question, because in these cases you'll
> still never see an ICMP entry in the connection tracking table.
> Because the ICMP packets are RELATED to the original connection, it's
> the original packet which you'll see in the conntrack table - the ICMP
> replies simply get through because of their
> relationship to the original packet.
True ;)
> > So, for ICMP requests, you have some kind of conntrack, based on ICMP
> > sequence number. For ICMP errors, conntrack tries to associate them to
> > an existing entry.
> ICMP sequence number ??? What's that ?
cbr@elendil:~$ ping thor
PING thor (192.168.10.50): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.10.50: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.3 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.50: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.3 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.50: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.2 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.50: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=0.3 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.50: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=0.3 ms
^^^^^^^^^^
This
Just spy an ICMP request/reply stuff such as ping with ethereal and look
at sequence number field. It aims to associate received reply to the
good sent request.
--
Cédric Blancher <blancher@cartel-securite.fr>
Consultant en sécurité des systèmes et réseaux - Cartel Sécurité
Tél: +33 (0)1 44 06 97 87 - Fax: +33 (0)1 44 06 97 99
PGP KeyID:157E98EE FingerPrint:FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-18 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-17 23:27 Rules not taking effect Tib
2002-10-17 23:35 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-18 0:32 ` Rules not taking effect - 2nd try Tib
2002-10-18 2:51 ` ICMP conntrack Vincent Lim
2002-10-18 8:28 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-18 9:05 ` Cedric Blancher
2002-10-18 9:52 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-18 10:07 ` Vincent Lim
2002-10-18 10:22 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-18 10:54 ` Cedric Blancher [this message]
2002-10-18 8:25 ` Rules not taking effect - 2nd try Antony Stone
2002-10-18 9:35 ` Tib
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1034938450.8912.29.camel@elendil \
--to=blancher@cartel-securite.fr \
--cc=Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.