From: Andy Pfiffer <andyp@osdl.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>,
Petr Vandrovec <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>,
fastboot@osdl.org, Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, "Ph. Marek" <marek@bmlv.gv.at>,
Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>,
Torrey Hoffman <thoffman@arnor.net>,
Rob Landley <landley@trommello.org>,
Kasper Dupont <kasperd@daimi.au.dk>
Subject: Re: [CFT] [PATCH] kexec 2.5.44 (minimal)
Date: 30 Oct 2002 14:41:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1036017717.1726.7.camel@andyp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1lm4jj7v5.fsf_-_@frodo.biederman.org>
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 00:16, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> And is currently kept in two pieces.
> The pure system call.
> http://www.xmission.com/~ebiederm/files/kexec/linux-2.5.44.x86kexec-2.diff
>
> And the set of hardware fixes known to help kexec.
> http://www.xmission.com/~ebiederm/files/kexec/linux-2.5.44.x86kexec-hwfixes.diff
Eric,
Hmmm... I'm having a lot more problems on my troublesome machine with
this patchset than I did with the previous iteration. I've
triple-checked the application of the patches, but I can't even get
kexec_test to start, much less run to completion.
The new behavior is that the system appears to hang immediately after
invoking "kexec kexec_test".
What could I have done wrong?
Thanks,
Andy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-30 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-19 10:10 kexec for 2.5.44 (Who do I send this to?) Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-19 19:23 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-19 21:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-20 23:02 ` Rob Landley
2002-10-21 12:31 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-21 14:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-21 20:54 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-20 19:09 ` Pavel Machek
2002-10-26 13:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-27 17:44 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-27 22:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-30 14:02 ` Pavel Machek
2002-10-30 15:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-28 8:16 ` [CFT] [PATCH] kexec 2.5.44 (minimal) Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-30 22:41 ` Andy Pfiffer [this message]
2002-10-31 3:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1036017717.1726.7.camel@andyp \
--to=andyp@osdl.org \
--cc=VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fastboot@osdl.org \
--cc=kasperd@daimi.au.dk \
--cc=landley@trommello.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek@bmlv.gv.at \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=proski@gnu.org \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=thoffman@arnor.net \
--cc=wa@almesberger.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.