* [BENCHMARK] 2.5.52-mm1 with contest
@ 2002-12-18 21:25 Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2002-12-18 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux kernel mailing list; +Cc: Andrew Morton
Here are contest benchmarks for 2.5.52-mm1 for SMP only:
noload:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.50 [5] 39.3 180 0 0 1.09
2.5.50-mm1 [6] 39.4 181 0 0 1.09
2.5.51 [3] 39.6 180 0 0 1.09
2.5.51-mm1 [3] 39.5 181 0 0 1.09
2.5.51-mm2 [3] 39.1 182 0 0 1.08
2.5.52 [7] 39.3 181 0 0 1.09
2.5.52-mm1 [8] 39.7 180 0 0 1.10
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.50 [5] 36.5 194 0 0 1.01
2.5.50-mm1 [6] 36.6 194 0 0 1.01
2.5.51 [3] 36.5 195 0 0 1.01
2.5.51-mm1 [2] 36.8 194 0 0 1.02
2.5.51-mm2 [3] 36.4 195 0 0 1.01
2.5.52 [7] 36.5 194 0 0 1.01
2.5.52-mm1 [7] 36.9 194 0 0 1.02
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.50 [5] 47.8 148 10 46 1.32
2.5.50-mm1 [5] 47.6 150 8 43 1.31
2.5.51 [3] 50.5 139 12 54 1.39
2.5.51-mm1 [2] 51.0 138 13 56 1.41
2.5.51-mm2 [3] 48.3 145 11 49 1.33
2.5.52 [7] 48.7 144 10 49 1.34
2.5.52-mm1 [7] 49.0 144 10 50 1.35
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.50 [5] 54.6 157 1 10 1.51
2.5.50-mm1 [5] 51.3 155 0 4 1.42
2.5.51 [7] 58.2 158 1 10 1.61
2.5.51-mm2 [7] 55.1 158 1 11 1.52
2.5.52 [7] 56.1 161 1 10 1.55
2.5.52-mm1 [7] 55.5 156 1 10 1.53
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.50 [5] 116.2 103 2 10 3.21
2.5.50-mm1 [5] 83.9 111 1 9 2.32
2.5.51 [7] 104.8 124 2 10 2.89
2.5.51-mm2 [7] 100.2 112 1 10 2.77
2.5.52 [7] 83.1 138 1 9 2.29
2.5.52-mm1 [7] 77.4 122 1 8 2.14
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.50 [5] 87.6 102 14 22 2.42
2.5.50-mm1 [5] 99.0 92 14 21 2.73
2.5.51 [7] 84.6 102 13 21 2.34
2.5.51-mm2 [7] 86.4 101 12 21 2.39
2.5.52 [7] 73.1 111 10 19 2.02
2.5.52-mm1 [7] 80.5 108 10 19 2.22
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.50 [5] 59.3 139 7 18 1.64
2.5.50-mm1 [5] 70.5 125 10 22 1.95
2.5.51 [7] 64.5 134 7 18 1.78
2.5.51-mm2 [7] 64.1 133 7 20 1.77
2.5.52 [7] 75.1 120 10 21 2.07
2.5.52-mm1 [7] 60.1 131 7 18 1.66
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.50 [5] 49.3 151 5 7 1.36
2.5.50-mm1 [5] 52.1 142 2 3 1.44
2.5.51 [3] 48.5 154 5 7 1.34
2.5.51-mm2 [2] 49.4 151 6 7 1.36
2.5.52 [7] 49.4 151 5 7 1.36
2.5.52-mm1 [7] 49.9 149 5 6 1.38
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.50 [5] 43.4 167 0 8 1.20
2.5.50-mm1 [5] 44.0 167 0 7 1.22
2.5.51 [3] 43.5 167 0 8 1.20
2.5.51-mm2 [2] 43.3 168 0 8 1.20
2.5.52 [7] 43.2 167 0 9 1.19
2.5.52-mm1 [7] 43.8 167 0 9 1.21
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.50 [5] 63.3 141 36 3 1.75
2.5.50-mm1 [5] 67.1 126 39 3 1.85
2.5.51 [7] 62.6 148 38 3 1.73
2.5.51-mm2 [7] 63.0 144 38 3 1.74
2.5.52 [7] 63.5 148 38 3 1.75
2.5.52-mm1 [7] 71.1 123 36 2 1.96
Shorter times on the io writing loads (io load, io other, xtar load).
Slightly longer time on mem_load without any increase in the amount of loads
performed.
I can't offer meaningful Uniprocessor results because unfortunately doing a make
clean, mrproper, config, dep in that testbed tree seems to invalidate previous
results even with the same .config. Why the same config can take longer or
shorter to compile after cleaning up the tree makes no sense to me but since
I've observed it I'll mention it and not post the results.
Further details and archived results can be found here:
http://www.osdl.org/projects/ctdevel/results/
Regards,
Con
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-12-18 21:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-18 21:25 [BENCHMARK] 2.5.52-mm1 with contest Con Kolivas
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.