From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio
Date: 19 Dec 2002 19:16:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1040343375.2519.87.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200212201104.28863.conman@kolivas.net>
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 19:04, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Thanks. That looks fair enough. My only concern is that io_load performance is
> worse with lower prio_bonus_ratio settings and io loads are the most felt.
>
> I was thinking of changing what it varied. I was going to leave the timeslice
> fixed and use it to change the prio_bonus_ratio under load. Although that
> kind of defeats the purpose of having it in the first place since it is
> supposed to decide what is interactive under load?
Yep.
You want to find good defaults that just work.
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-20 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-19 21:50 [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio Con Kolivas
2002-12-19 22:46 ` Robert Love
2002-12-19 23:18 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-19 23:41 ` Robert Love
2002-12-20 0:02 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-20 0:15 ` Robert Love
2002-12-20 0:22 ` Con Kolivas
2002-12-20 0:29 ` Robert Love
2002-12-20 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-20 2:42 ` Robert Love
2002-12-20 2:48 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-24 22:26 ` scott thomason
2002-12-25 7:29 ` Con Kolivas
2002-12-25 16:17 ` scott thomason
2002-12-26 15:01 ` scott thomason
2003-01-01 0:31 ` Impact of scheduler tunables on interactive response (was Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio) scott thomason
2003-01-01 16:05 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-01-01 17:15 ` scott thomason
2002-12-19 23:42 ` [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio Con Kolivas
2002-12-19 23:53 ` Robert Love
2002-12-20 0:04 ` Con Kolivas
2002-12-20 0:16 ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-12-20 11:17 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2002-12-20 17:54 ` Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1040343375.2519.87.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.