From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
Cc: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio
Date: 20 Dec 2002 12:54:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1040406854.2519.119.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200212201217.07097.m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 06:17, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> FYI: These changes are a horrible slowdown of all apps while kernel
> compilation.
Try leaving interactive_delta at 2. If there are still issues, then it
may just be the normal "lack" of interactivity bonus. A heavy compile
is never pleasant to the other applications.
You could also try Andrew's numbers (max_timeslice=10 and
prio_bonus_rate=0 or 10), but I would prefer not to decrease
max_timeslice so much.
Robert Love
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-20 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-19 21:50 [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio Con Kolivas
2002-12-19 22:46 ` Robert Love
2002-12-19 23:18 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-19 23:41 ` Robert Love
2002-12-20 0:02 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-20 0:15 ` Robert Love
2002-12-20 0:22 ` Con Kolivas
2002-12-20 0:29 ` Robert Love
2002-12-20 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-20 2:42 ` Robert Love
2002-12-20 2:48 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-24 22:26 ` scott thomason
2002-12-25 7:29 ` Con Kolivas
2002-12-25 16:17 ` scott thomason
2002-12-26 15:01 ` scott thomason
2003-01-01 0:31 ` Impact of scheduler tunables on interactive response (was Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio) scott thomason
2003-01-01 16:05 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-01-01 17:15 ` scott thomason
2002-12-19 23:42 ` [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio Con Kolivas
2002-12-19 23:53 ` Robert Love
2002-12-20 0:04 ` Con Kolivas
2002-12-20 0:16 ` Robert Love
2002-12-20 11:17 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2002-12-20 17:54 ` Robert Love [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1040406854.2519.119.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.