* Re: [PATCH] data logging patches available for 2.4.21-preX
@ 2003-01-27 18:14 Dieter Nützel
2003-01-27 18:33 ` Chris Mason
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dieter Nützel @ 2003-01-27 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Mason
Cc: Linux Kernel List, ReiserFS List, Manuel Krause, J.A. Magallon
Chris Mason wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've updated the data logging patches to 2.4.21-pre3, once the suse
> mirror is done updating, you can download them from:
>
> ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21
>
> Changes:
>
> mount -o remount can switch between data modes.
>
> transaction overflow bug fix (BUG in journal_mark_dirty)
>
> fix for -ENOSPC hang when the block size < page size (ia64, alpha)
>
> integration with akpm's b_journal_head code from -ac. Should make it
> possible for these patches to work both on vanilla kernels and Alan's
> branch. I haven't tried this yet though, so testers would be
> appreciated.
>
> commit_super is now sync_fs
>
> I had to rework some of the data=ordered buffer handling code to merge
> with the changes in 2.4.21-preX, so use some caution with this code.
Hello Chris,
as always very nice work!
I have it now running fine on top of 2.4.21-pre3-jam3 (2.4.21-pre3aa1).
Some fiddling was necessary but went smooth after all.
My /home partition is mounted with -o data=ordered and the performance is
great. Sorry, no real benchmarks, yet.
But some question stay open:
Where is 01-akpm-sync_fs-fix-2.diff and 01-iput-deadlock-fix.diff?
Isn't it needed anylonger 'cause you merged them and SuSE's ftp isn't updated
yet? All files are the "old" one's from 15. January.
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21
What about patch-2.4.20.rfs.06.05-transaction-overflow-fix-0.diff?
Should I put it on top, too?
Thanks,
Dieter
--
Dieter Nützel
Graduate Student, Computer Science
University of Hamburg
Department of Computer Science
@home: Dieter.Nuetzel at hamburg.de (replace at with @)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] data logging patches available for 2.4.21-preX
2003-01-27 18:14 [PATCH] data logging patches available for 2.4.21-preX Dieter Nützel
@ 2003-01-27 18:33 ` Chris Mason
2003-01-27 18:49 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-01-27 18:59 ` Manuel Krause
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Mason @ 2003-01-27 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dieter Nützel
Cc: Linux Kernel List, ReiserFS List, Manuel Krause, J.A. Magallon
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 13:14, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> as always very nice work!
> I have it now running fine on top of 2.4.21-pre3-jam3 (2.4.21-pre3aa1).
> Some fiddling was necessary but went smooth after all.
> My /home partition is mounted with -o data=ordered and the performance is
> great. Sorry, no real benchmarks, yet.
>
Thanks for trying them out.
> But some question stay open:
> Where is 01-akpm-sync_fs-fix-2.diff
01-akpm-sync_fs-fix-2.diff is in the 2.4.21 data logging directory you
linked to below.
> and 01-iput-deadlock-fix.diff?
This is in the namesys pending directory, but doesn't apply cleanly
yet. I'm rediffing both the quota code and the data logging code on top
of 01-iput-deadlock-fix (or I might just steal Manuel's rediff, which is
still in my linuxworld backlog).
> Isn't it needed anylonger 'cause you merged them and SuSE's ftp isn't updated
> yet? All files are the "old" one's from 15. January.
> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21
>
> What about patch-2.4.20.rfs.06.05-transaction-overflow-fix-0.diff?
> Should I put it on top, too?
That is included in 05-data-logging-33.
-chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] data logging patches available for 2.4.21-preX
2003-01-27 18:33 ` Chris Mason
@ 2003-01-27 18:49 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-01-27 20:42 ` Manuel Krause
2003-01-28 7:37 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-01-27 18:59 ` Manuel Krause
1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dieter Nützel @ 2003-01-27 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Mason; +Cc: Linux Kernel List, ReiserFS List, Manuel Krause
Am Montag, 27. Januar 2003 19:33 schrieb Chris Mason:
> On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 13:14, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > Hello Chris,
> >
> > as always very nice work!
> > I have it now running fine on top of 2.4.21-pre3-jam3 (2.4.21-pre3aa1).
> > Some fiddling was necessary but went smooth after all.
> > My /home partition is mounted with -o data=ordered and the performance is
> > great. Sorry, no real benchmarks, yet.
>
> Thanks for trying them out.
>
> > But some question stay open:
> > Where is 01-akpm-sync_fs-fix-2.diff
>
> 01-akpm-sync_fs-fix-2.diff is in the 2.4.21 data logging directory you
> linked to below.
It was and I have it but it isn't any longer...
Both 01- are missing, now
> > and 01-iput-deadlock-fix.diff?
>
> This is in the namesys pending directory, but doesn't apply cleanly
> yet.
OK, you moved it;-)
> I'm rediffing both the quota code and the data logging code on top
> of 01-iput-deadlock-fix (or I might just steal Manuel's rediff, which is
> still in my linuxworld backlog).
Manuel's version (33b) had some trouble with -pre3aa1 (-pre3-jam3), too.
> > Isn't it needed anylonger 'cause you merged them and SuSE's ftp isn't
> > updated yet? All files are the "old" one's from 15. January.
> > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21
> >
> > What about patch-2.4.20.rfs.06.05-transaction-overflow-fix-0.diff?
> > Should I put it on top, too?
>
> That is included in 05-data-logging-33.
Nice, no recompile needed then ;-)
I'll do some "normal" vs data=journal/ordered "time synctest -F -f -n 1 -t 100
dir_name" tests, now.
Maybe I integrate preemption...
-Dieter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] data logging patches available for 2.4.21-preX
2003-01-27 18:49 ` Dieter Nützel
@ 2003-01-27 20:42 ` Manuel Krause
2003-01-28 6:56 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-01-28 7:37 ` Dieter Nützel
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Manuel Krause @ 2003-01-27 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dieter Nützel; +Cc: Chris Mason, reiserfs-list
On 01/27/2003 07:49 PM, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> Am Montag, 27. Januar 2003 19:33 schrieb Chris Mason:
>
>>On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 13:14, Dieter Nützel wrote:
>>
>>>Hello Chris,
>>>
>>>as always very nice work!
>>>I have it now running fine on top of 2.4.21-pre3-jam3 (2.4.21-pre3aa1).
>>>Some fiddling was necessary but went smooth after all.
>>>My /home partition is mounted with -o data=ordered and the performance is
>>>great. Sorry, no real benchmarks, yet.
>>
>>Thanks for trying them out.
>>
>>>But some question stay open:
>>>Where is 01-akpm-sync_fs-fix-2.diff
>>
>>01-akpm-sync_fs-fix-2.diff is in the 2.4.21 data logging directory you
>>linked to below.
>
> It was and I have it but it isn't any longer...
> Both 01- are missing, now
Must be an on-disk or ftp access problem known for SuSEs main server.
ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/ftp.suse.com/people/mason/patches/data-logging/
still has all "old" files and _does_ transfer them ;-)
(Don't know how often they do their updates, though.)
Ooops. Getting web connection problems, too, in the moment I write.
>>> and 01-iput-deadlock-fix.diff?
>>
>>This is in the namesys pending directory, but doesn't apply cleanly
>>yet.
>
> OK, you moved it;-)
:-)) Yess. Oleg posted first about.
>>I'm rediffing both the quota code and the data logging code on top
>>of 01-iput-deadlock-fix (or I might just steal Manuel's rediff, which is
>>still in my linuxworld backlog).
>
> Manuel's version (33b) had some trouble with -pre3aa1 (-pre3-jam3), too.
It's only adjusted for namesys' 01-iput-deadlock-fix and tested to work
with the rml.preempt-patch on here. Of course it's no developers work --
merely an editors one.
Where can I find the *jam* page with more information?
>>>Isn't it needed anylonger 'cause you merged them and SuSE's ftp isn't
>>>updated yet? All files are the "old" one's from 15. January.
>>>ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21
>>>
>>>What about patch-2.4.20.rfs.06.05-transaction-overflow-fix-0.diff?
>>>Should I put it on top, too?
>>
>>That is included in 05-data-logging-33.
>
> Nice, no recompile needed then ;-)
>
> I'll do some "normal" vs data=journal/ordered "time synctest -F -f -n 1 -t 100
> dir_name" tests, now.
BTW, does the on-disk FS structure matter with this comparison? (FS
content created with data=journal/ordered <-> tested with
data=journal/ordered) -- Or did this only have importance when Oleg
introduced the new block allocator?
> Maybe I integrate preemption...
DO exactly this.
Bye,
Manuel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] data logging patches available for 2.4.21-preX
2003-01-27 20:42 ` Manuel Krause
@ 2003-01-28 6:56 ` Oleg Drokin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Drokin @ 2003-01-28 6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manuel Krause; +Cc: Dieter N?tzel, Chris Mason, reiserfs-list
Hello!
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 09:42:12PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
> BTW, does the on-disk FS structure matter with this comparison? (FS
It should. Data layout determines how often (and how far) you do your seeks.
> content created with data=journal/ordered <-> tested with
> data=journal/ordered) -- Or did this only have importance when Oleg
> introduced the new block allocator?
Old allocator had different behaviour than new one. (in default config),
also they have different tail policies.
Bye,
Oleg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] data logging patches available for 2.4.21-preX
2003-01-27 18:49 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-01-27 20:42 ` Manuel Krause
@ 2003-01-28 7:37 ` Dieter Nützel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dieter Nützel @ 2003-01-28 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Mason, Oleg Drokin; +Cc: ReiserFS List
Am Montag, 27. Januar 2003 19:49 schrieb Dieter Nützel:
> Am Montag, 27. Januar 2003 19:33 schrieb Chris Mason:
> > On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 13:14, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > > Hello Chris,
> > >
> > > as always very nice work!
> > > I have it now running fine on top of 2.4.21-pre3-jam3 (2.4.21-pre3aa1).
> > > Some fiddling was necessary but went smooth after all.
> > > My /home partition is mounted with -o data=ordered and the performance
> > > is great. Sorry, no real benchmarks, yet.
> >
> > Thanks for trying them out.
[-]
> I'll do some "normal" vs data=journal/ordered "time synctest -F -f -n 1 -t
> 100 dir_name" tests, now.
Good morning to Oleg ;-)
Puh, this took some time.
I've used one of my old IBM DDRS-34560 SCSI disks.
Second partition in the first half.
Raw transfer rate is:
SunWave1 /database# hdparm -tT /dev/sdb5
/dev/sdb5:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.46 seconds =278.26 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 6.00 seconds = 10.67 MB/sec
Latest aic7xx 6.2.28 SCSI driver seems to be a little bit slow.
I had ~12,8 MB/s before.
I've created a new file system before every run.
First round:
synctest -F -f -n 1 -t 100 /database/db1/test/
Two runs for all three mount options.
normal
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................****************************************************************************************************
1.620u 67.130s 7:26.85 15.3% 0+0k 0+0io 607pf+0w
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................*...***.**************.**********************************************************************************
2.260u 73.100s 7:01.34 17.8% 0+0k 0+0io 607pf+0w
data=ordered
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................*..*****.************************************************.**********************************************
1.580u 75.950s 9:11.18 14.0% 0+0k 0+0io 607pf+0w
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................*.******.**.*******************************.*******************.*****************************************
1.370u 76.460s 9:06.92 14.2% 0+0k 0+0io 607pf+0w
data=journal
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................****************************************************************************************************
1.780u 67.840s 7:30.93 15.4% 0+0k 0+0io 607pf+0w
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................*****.********.********.*******************************************************************************
2.420u 71.410s 7:01.52 17.5% 0+0k 0+0io 607pf+0w
Second round:
synctest -n 1 -t 100 /database/db1/test/
This time only one trip for every mount option.
normal
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................*********************************************************************************.*............................*****...*...........**.........*.......*......*....*.......**........*.*.**
0.240u 8.430s 0:28.94 29.9% 0+0k 0+0io 607pf+0w
data=ordered
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................**************************************************************************************....*..........*.*..*.........**.....*...*.........*..*...*......*.*...*
0.250u 9.140s 1:19.15 11.8% 0+0k 0+0io 607pf+0w
data=journal
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................**********************************************************************************************..............*......*........*..*...**
0.210u 12.590s 3:14.74 6.5% 0+0k 0+0io 607pf+0w
> Maybe I integrate preemption...
Later.
Good night! ;-)
-Dieter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] data logging patches available for 2.4.21-preX
2003-01-27 18:33 ` Chris Mason
2003-01-27 18:49 ` Dieter Nützel
@ 2003-01-27 18:59 ` Manuel Krause
2003-01-27 19:57 ` Dieter Nützel
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Manuel Krause @ 2003-01-27 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Mason; +Cc: Dieter Nuetzel, reiserfs-list
On 01/27/2003 07:33 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 13:14, Dieter Nützel wrote:
>
>>Hello Chris,
>>
>>as always very nice work!
>>I have it now running fine on top of 2.4.21-pre3-jam3 (2.4.21-pre3aa1).
>>Some fiddling was necessary but went smooth after all.
>>My /home partition is mounted with -o data=ordered and the performance is
>>great. Sorry, no real benchmarks, yet.
>
> Thanks for trying them out.
>
>>But some question stay open:
>>Where is 01-akpm-sync_fs-fix-2.diff
>
> 01-akpm-sync_fs-fix-2.diff is in the 2.4.21 data logging directory you
> linked to below.
>
>> and 01-iput-deadlock-fix.diff?
>
> This is in the namesys pending directory, but doesn't apply cleanly
> yet. I'm rediffing both the quota code and the data logging code on top
> of 01-iput-deadlock-fix (or I might just steal Manuel's rediff, which is
> still in my linuxworld backlog).
If they're o.k. just feel free to do so... :-))
Dieter, you still aren't subscribed?
I (only) changed the rejected things so the patches would apply and put
the files
for 2.4.20 @
http://manuel.krause.bei.t-online.de/downloads/2.4.20/03-data-logging-32b.diff.gz
for 2.4.21-pre(3) @
http://manuel.krause.bei.t-online.de/downloads/2.4.21-pre/05-data-logging-33b.diff.gz
on friday.
( First apply 01-iput-deadlock-fix, then Chris' patches with the one
replaced from above. )
Bye,
Manuel
P.S.: The data=ordered mode (of which Chris wrote we should be careful
with) runs fine here since the patches came out! :-)
>>Isn't it needed anylonger 'cause you merged them and SuSE's ftp isn't updated
>>yet? All files are the "old" one's from 15. January.
>>ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21
>>
>>What about patch-2.4.20.rfs.06.05-transaction-overflow-fix-0.diff?
>>Should I put it on top, too?
>
> That is included in 05-data-logging-33.
>
> -chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] data logging patches available for 2.4.21-preX
2003-01-27 18:59 ` Manuel Krause
@ 2003-01-27 19:57 ` Dieter Nützel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dieter Nützel @ 2003-01-27 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manuel Krause, Chris Mason; +Cc: reiserfs-list
Am Montag, 27. Januar 2003 19:59 schrieb Manuel Krause:
> On 01/27/2003 07:33 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 13:14, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> >>Hello Chris,
> >>
> >>as always very nice work!
> >>I have it now running fine on top of 2.4.21-pre3-jam3 (2.4.21-pre3aa1).
> >>Some fiddling was necessary but went smooth after all.
> >>My /home partition is mounted with -o data=ordered and the performance is
> >>great. Sorry, no real benchmarks, yet.
> >
> > Thanks for trying them out.
> >
> >>But some question stay open:
> >>Where is 01-akpm-sync_fs-fix-2.diff
> >
> > 01-akpm-sync_fs-fix-2.diff is in the 2.4.21 data logging directory you
> > linked to below.
> >
> >> and 01-iput-deadlock-fix.diff?
> >
> > This is in the namesys pending directory, but doesn't apply cleanly
> > yet. I'm rediffing both the quota code and the data logging code on top
> > of 01-iput-deadlock-fix (or I might just steal Manuel's rediff, which is
> > still in my linuxworld backlog).
>
> If they're o.k. just feel free to do so... :-))
>
>
> Dieter, you still aren't subscribed?
I am ;-)
> I (only) changed the rejected things so the patches would apply and put
> the files
>
> for 2.4.20 @
> http://manuel.krause.bei.t-online.de/downloads/2.4.20/03-data-logging-32b.d
>iff.gz
>
> for 2.4.21-pre(3) @
> http://manuel.krause.bei.t-online.de/downloads/2.4.21-pre/05-data-logging-3
>3b.diff.gz
>
> on friday.
> ( First apply 01-iput-deadlock-fix, then Chris' patches with the one
> replaced from above. )
I've them running with some additional fiddling on top of 2.4.21-pre3-jam3 as
I wrote.
> Bye,
>
> Manuel
>
> P.S.: The data=ordered mode (of which Chris wrote we should be careful
> with) runs fine here since the patches came out! :-)
Here, too.
-Dieter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] data logging patches available for 2.4.21-preX
@ 2003-01-15 21:20 Chris Mason
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Mason @ 2003-01-15 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list
Hello all,
I've updated the data logging patches to 2.4.21-pre3, once the suse
mirror is done updating, you can download them from:
ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21
Changes:
mount -o remount can switch between data modes.
transaction overflow bug fix (BUG in journal_mark_dirty)
fix for -ENOSPC hang when the block size < page size (ia64, alpha)
integration with akpm's b_journal_head code from -ac. Should make it
possible for these patches to work both on vanilla kernels and Alan's
branch. I haven't tried this yet though, so testers would be
appreciated.
commit_super is now sync_fs
I had to rework some of the data=ordered buffer handling code to merge
with the changes in 2.4.21-preX, so use some caution with this code.
-chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-28 7:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-27 18:14 [PATCH] data logging patches available for 2.4.21-preX Dieter Nützel
2003-01-27 18:33 ` Chris Mason
2003-01-27 18:49 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-01-27 20:42 ` Manuel Krause
2003-01-28 6:56 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-01-28 7:37 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-01-27 18:59 ` Manuel Krause
2003-01-27 19:57 ` Dieter Nützel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-15 21:20 Chris Mason
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.