From: Thomas Schlichter <schlicht@rumms.uni-mannheim.de>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.60-mm2
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 13:35:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1045485310.3e50d6fe94f1e@rumms.uni-mannheim.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1030217070321.31221A-101000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
Quoting Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>:
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, I wrote:
>
> > > I've got NFS problems with 2.5.5x - 60-bk3, too, but here I can
> workaround
> > > them by simply pinging the NFS-server every second... Funny, but it
> works!
> > > Perhaps this can help finding the real bug?!
>
> [ let's try this again, not typing in a moving car ]
>
> > I was looking for network issues when I started timing pings, and didn't
> > see any. I thought it was bad timing, like not raining when you have a
> > coat, but maybe I was curing it.
>
> Since it's possible that pings will actually change the problem rather
> than measure it, I'll tcpdump for a while and see if that tells me
> anything. I suspected network problems, since tcp has priority over udp in
> some places.
>
> I looked at the code last night, but I don't see anything explaining a
> ping making things better. Something getting flushed?
I'm sorry, I don't exactly know what you want me to do... I'm not involved in
the linux net code and I did not even try to understand it yet...
I just have a small environment with a FreeBSD 4.6 box using my Linux box as a
NFS file server. This worked fine with my 2.4 kernel but with the 2.5.x test
kernels I've got the problem the FreeBSD box says 'NFS server not responding'
until I do simple pings (ICMP echo request, ICMP echo respond) to the linux box
(the NFS server)...
Letting the ping run all the time NFS works so stable I even can do lots of
compilations over it without any problems.
So I don't have any answer WHY this helps, but it does... Perhaps it really is
just a timing issue, I just don't know... If you can tell me what to measure and
which values would be interesting I'll do these tests and send you the
results...
Thomas Schlichter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Schlichter <schlicht@rumms.uni-mannheim.de>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.60-mm2
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 13:35:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1045485310.3e50d6fe94f1e@rumms.uni-mannheim.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1030217070321.31221A-101000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
Quoting Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>:
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, I wrote:
>
> > > I've got NFS problems with 2.5.5x - 60-bk3, too, but here I can
> workaround
> > > them by simply pinging the NFS-server every second... Funny, but it
> works!
> > > Perhaps this can help finding the real bug?!
>
> [ let's try this again, not typing in a moving car ]
>
> > I was looking for network issues when I started timing pings, and didn't
> > see any. I thought it was bad timing, like not raining when you have a
> > coat, but maybe I was curing it.
>
> Since it's possible that pings will actually change the problem rather
> than measure it, I'll tcpdump for a while and see if that tells me
> anything. I suspected network problems, since tcp has priority over udp in
> some places.
>
> I looked at the code last night, but I don't see anything explaining a
> ping making things better. Something getting flushed?
I'm sorry, I don't exactly know what you want me to do... I'm not involved in
the linux net code and I did not even try to understand it yet...
I just have a small environment with a FreeBSD 4.6 box using my Linux box as a
NFS file server. This worked fine with my 2.4 kernel but with the 2.5.x test
kernels I've got the problem the FreeBSD box says 'NFS server not responding'
until I do simple pings (ICMP echo request, ICMP echo respond) to the linux box
(the NFS server)...
Letting the ping run all the time NFS works so stable I even can do lots of
compilations over it without any problems.
So I don't have any answer WHY this helps, but it does... Perhaps it really is
just a timing issue, I just don't know... If you can tell me what to measure and
which values would be interesting I'll do these tests and send you the
results...
Thomas Schlichter
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-17 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-14 9:31 2.5.60-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-02-14 9:31 ` 2.5.60-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-02-14 9:38 ` 2.5.60-mm2 Dave Jones
2003-02-14 9:38 ` 2.5.60-mm2 Dave Jones
2003-02-14 9:58 ` 2.5.60-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-02-14 9:58 ` 2.5.60-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-02-14 10:13 ` 2.5.60-mm2 Dave Jones
2003-02-14 10:13 ` 2.5.60-mm2 Dave Jones
2003-02-14 10:22 ` 2.5.60-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-02-14 10:22 ` 2.5.60-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-02-14 10:10 ` 2.5.60-mm2 Thomas Schlichter
2003-02-17 1:59 ` 2.5.60-mm2 Bill Davidsen
2003-02-17 12:08 ` 2.5.60-mm2 Bill Davidsen
2003-02-17 12:35 ` Thomas Schlichter [this message]
2003-02-17 12:35 ` 2.5.60-mm2 Thomas Schlichter
2003-02-17 18:32 ` 2.5.60-mm2 Bill Davidsen
2003-02-17 18:32 ` 2.5.60-mm2 Bill Davidsen
2003-02-14 20:59 ` compile fail: 2.5.60-mm2 Core
2003-02-14 21:18 ` Joshua Kwan
2003-02-14 22:06 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-14 22:06 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-15 20:27 ` 2.5.60-mm2 Arador
2003-02-15 20:27 ` 2.5.60-mm2 Arador
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-14 13:02 2.5.60-mm2 Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1045485310.3e50d6fe94f1e@rumms.uni-mannheim.de \
--to=schlicht@rumms.uni-mannheim.de \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.