mb800 watchdog driver

mb800 watchdog driver

[Grzegorz Jaskiewicz]

Hello guys !

I've wrote small driver for mb800 motherboards (x86, intel). And i want
to share with others. 
Any comments/patches are welcome.

You can download source from :
http://hit-six.co.uk/~gj/mb800_watchdog.tar.bz2


-- 
Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj@pointblue.com.pl>
K4 Labs

Re: mb800 watchdog driver

[Joern Engel]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit, Size: 683 bytes --]

On Thu, 13 March 2003 15:10:33 -0100, Dave Jones wrote:
> 
> in fact, these printk's should probably be something like dprintk's
> with dprintk being defined at the top of source like..
> 
> #define DEBUG
> #ifndef DEBUG
> # define dprintk(format, args...)
> #else
> # define dprintk(format, args...) printk(KERN_DEBUG "mb8wdog:", ## args)
                                                               ^^
> #endif

You might want to put an additional whitespace at the indicated
position, that works around a gcc 2.x bug.

Jörn

-- 
Mundie uses a textbook tactic of manipulation: start with some
reasonable talk, and lead the audience to an unreasonable conclusion.
-- Bruce Perens

Re: mb800 watchdog driver

[Dave Jones]

On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:11:04AM +0000, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote:
 > 
 > I've wrote small driver for mb800 motherboards (x86, intel). And i want
 > to share with others. 
 > Any comments/patches are welcome.


> #include <sys/syscall.h>

not needed.
 
> #include <linux/version.h>

not needed.

> #include <linux/errno.h>            
> #include <linux/stddef.h>           

not needed.

> #include <asm/page.h>               
> #include <asm/pgtable.h>            

not needed.

> #ifdef CONFIG_DEVFS_FS
> #include <linux/devfs_fs_kernel.h>
> #else
> #error "this driver requires devfs, otherwise it would not work - sorry dude"
> #endif

devfs only drivers == EVIL. Pure EVIL.

> spinlock_t tab_lock;

can be static

> static struct proc_dir_entry *proc_mtd;
> int tab_o_count;

unused

>static struct file_operations tabfs = {
>    owner   : THIS_MODULE,
>    open    : open_wdog,      /* open */
>    write   : write_wdog,	/* write */
>    release : close_wdog,   /* release */
> };

use C99  .owner = THIS_MODULE
Ok, this is a 2.4 driver, but it makes forward porting simpler.
Also, the comments are pointless.

> void LockChip()
> void UnLockChip()

can be static (as can most other functions in this file)

>/*
>    if (check_region(0x2e, 2)){
>	printk(KERN_INFO "tab: my I/O space is allready in use, can't share it .. sorry\n");
>	return -1;
>    }
>
>    request_region(0x2e, 2, "mb800 watchdog");
>*/    

1. Probably shouldn't be commented out.
2. Don't use check_region, just check return of request_region.

>    printk(KERN_INFO "watchdog: DIE !!!\n");

Something more userfriendly "mb8wdog: unloading\n" would be nicer.

>	printk(KERN_INFO "MB800 WATCHDOG: LOAD DEVICE ENDED\n");

KERN_DEBUG ? and STOP SHOUTING!

>	printk(KERN_INFO "MB800 WATCHDOG: ENTER CREATE DISPATCH\n");

in fact, these printk's should probably be something like dprintk's
with dprintk being defined at the top of source like..

#define DEBUG
#ifndef DEBUG
# define dprintk(format, args...)
#else
# define dprintk(format, args...) printk(KERN_DEBUG "mb8wdog:", ## args)
#endif

>    if (copy_from_user(&b, buf, 1)){
>	return -EFAULT;
>    }
>
>    if (b){    
>	EnableAndSetWatchdog(b);
>    }
>    else{
>	DisableWatchdog();
>    }

Please choose one indentation style, and stick to it.
Preferably the one described in Documenation/CodingStyle

	if (b) {
		EnableAndSetWatchdog(b);
	} else {
		DisableWatchdog();
	}

Other than these small nits, I don't see any problems with it.
The biggest issue is the devfs-only requirement, which as I mentioned,
is really evil, and afaics, totally unnecessary.

		Dave

Re: mb800 watchdog driver

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 03:10:33PM -0100, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:11:04AM +0000, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote:
>  > 
>  > I've wrote small driver for mb800 motherboards (x86, intel). And i want
>  > to share with others. 
>  > Any comments/patches are welcome.
> 
> 
> > #include <sys/syscall.h>
> 
> not needed.

Nor does it even compile with any recent kernel..

Re: mb800 watchdog driver

[Grzegorz Jaskiewicz]

On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 16:10, Dave Jones wrote:

> devfs only drivers == EVIL. Pure EVIL.
well, since i am using only devfs and i don't see (personaly) any reason
to continue standard /dev directory structure i didn't wrote that part,
but if somebody really want it - patches are welcomed.

I've tried to remove all unneded parts, make it more kernel style of
programming compatible.

new version is on the same place where older one was, as i assume it
does not make sense to keep old one.

http://hit-six.co.uk/~gj/mb800_watchdog.tar.bz2

Cheers.

-- 
Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj@pointblue.com.pl>
K4 Labs

Re: mb800 WatchDog driver

[Grzegorz Jaskiewicz]

Hi folks

Here is a little update to what I posted over one year ago. Some ppl are still 
asking me about this driver. It's now avaliable from:
http://gj.pointblue.com.pl/projects/mb800_watchdog.tar.bz2

I had no chance to rewrite it properly, sorry. If someone wants me to, I will 
need this motherboard. If someone else want's to make it properly, using 
watchdog api, and has this bord with him - it will be nice. 

Thanks.
-- 
Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
K4 labs