From: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
James Bourne <jbourne@mtroyal.ab.ca>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>,
Martin Mares <mj@ucw.cz>, Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>,
szepe@pinerecords.com, arjanv@redhat.com,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25
Date: 23 Mar 2003 23:43:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1048459411.2721.14.camel@teapot> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E7E335C.2050509@pobox.com>
On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 23:21, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> akpm has suggested something like this in the past. I respectfully
> disagree.
>
> The 2.4 kernel will not benefit from constant churn of backporting core
> kernel changes like a new scheduler. We need to let it settle, simply
> get it stable, and concentrate on fixing key problems in 2.6. Otherwise
> you will never have a stable 2.4 tree, and it will look suspiciously
> more and more like 2.6 as time goes by. Constantly breaking working
> configurations and changing core behaviors is _not_ the way to go for 2.4.
>
> I see 2.4 O(1) scheduler and similar features as _pain_ brought on the
> vendors by themselves (and their customers).
>
> Surely it is better to concentrate developer time and mindshare on
> making 2.6 sane?
I'm no hardcore kernel hacker, but I fully agree with you.
2.4 is pretty stable... Introducing new code (VM, IDE, etc) is just a
bit risky, more even when current 2.4 is 2.4.21 (I would say mature
enough).
________________________________________________________________________
Felipe Alfaro Solana
Linux Registered User #287198
http://counter.li.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-23 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-17 16:04 Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25 Alan Cox
2003-03-17 17:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-03-17 18:20 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-03-17 18:23 ` James Bourne
2003-03-17 18:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-03-21 21:17 ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-23 10:00 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-03-23 13:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-03-23 15:58 ` Petr Baudis
2003-03-23 19:25 ` Martin Mares
2003-03-23 19:30 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-23 19:34 ` Martin Mares
2003-03-23 19:38 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-23 19:44 ` Martin Mares
2003-03-23 19:47 ` Robert Love
2003-03-23 19:55 ` Henrik Persson
2003-03-23 20:13 ` Robert Love
2003-03-23 20:46 ` Henrik Persson
2003-03-23 19:56 ` Martin Mares
2003-03-23 20:08 ` Russell King
2003-03-23 22:26 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-23 20:10 ` Robert Love
2003-03-23 20:30 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-23 20:36 ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-23 21:20 ` Martin Hermanowski
2003-03-23 21:35 ` James Bourne
2003-03-23 21:53 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-23 22:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-03-23 22:29 ` James Bourne
2003-03-23 22:57 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-24 0:15 ` James Bourne
2003-03-23 22:43 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana [this message]
2003-03-23 22:54 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-23 23:19 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-23 23:34 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-24 3:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-03-24 3:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-03-24 6:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-03-24 12:17 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-23 23:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-03-23 23:45 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-24 0:07 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-03-24 6:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-03-24 0:09 ` Christian Axelsson
2003-03-24 20:05 ` aradorlinux
2003-03-23 20:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-03-23 20:51 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-24 0:51 ` Juan Quintela
2003-03-24 1:29 ` Brian Tinsley
2003-03-23 20:54 ` Robert Love
2003-03-23 22:13 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-23 21:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-03-23 21:59 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-23 22:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-03-23 22:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-25 11:35 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2003-03-25 11:36 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2003-03-23 20:09 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-03-23 20:21 ` Robert Love
2003-03-23 20:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-03-23 22:22 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-23 21:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-03-23 21:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-03-24 15:33 ` jlnance
2003-03-23 19:53 ` Jörn Engel
2003-03-24 0:08 ` Sven Schuster
2003-03-24 0:20 ` James Bourne
2003-03-24 0:37 ` Sven Schuster
2003-03-24 0:50 ` James Bourne
2003-03-24 0:39 ` Jörn Engel
2003-03-24 2:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-24 2:57 ` James Bourne
2003-03-24 2:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-24 14:42 ` Dave Jones
2003-03-27 7:47 ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-26 20:30 ` Dave Jones
2003-03-26 20:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-26 21:02 ` Jörn Engel
2003-03-27 5:20 ` James Bourne
2003-03-23 19:41 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-03-17 19:34 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-17 18:27 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-03-17 19:23 ` Neale Banks
2003-03-18 18:44 ` James Bourne
[not found] <20030317161020$42ed@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-03-17 18:39 ` Ben Pfaff
2003-03-18 1:46 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-19 11:28 mlafon
2003-03-19 20:09 Matthew Grant
2003-03-19 21:34 ` Matthew Grant
[not found] <20030323194012$6886@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030323194014$66c3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030323195010$5026@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030323195012$6f30@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030323200029$737b@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030323202005$2a74@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-03-23 20:33 ` Florian Weimer
2003-03-23 22:24 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-23 21:46 ` Florian Weimer
2003-03-23 23:05 ` Alan Cox
[not found] ` <20030323200023$1a65@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030323202014$096a@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-03-23 20:35 ` Florian Weimer
2003-03-23 20:59 ` Robert Love
2003-03-23 22:38 Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-23 22:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-03-23 23:06 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-24 10:30 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-03-24 10:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-03-24 15:40 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-24 16:55 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-03-27 14:47 Dr. Greg Wettstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1048459411.2721.14.camel@teapot \
--to=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=jbourne@mtroyal.ab.ca \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=mj@ucw.cz \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=szepe@pinerecords.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.