From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Peter Lundkvist <p.lundkvist@telia.com>, akpm@digeo.com, mingo@elte.hu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bad interactive behaviour in 2.5.65-66 (sched.c)
Date: 29 Mar 2003 18:23:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1048980204.13757.17.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E8610EA.8080309@telia.com>
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 16:32, Peter Lundkvist wrote:
> I have seen long delays when starting e.g. xterm from my
> window manager (sawfish) either by keyboard-shortcut or by
> menu command (by mouse) starting from 2.5.65. Sometimes it
> starts immediately, sometimes after up to 2 seconds (idle
> system). If I start a new xterm from xterm it always start
> immediately. 2.5.64 always behaved OK.
You are not alone...
> My first try to solve this problem was to use some
> scheduler parameters from 2.6.64:
> #define MAX_TIMESLICE (300 * HZ / 1000)
> #define CHILD_PENALTY 95
> #define MAX_SLEEP_AVG (2*HZ)
> #define STARVATION_LIMIT (2*HZ)
>
> but got the same behaviour.
Expected.
> 2nd try was to use sched.c, sched.h from 2.5.64 in a
> 2.5.66 build + one line patch in fork.c:
> - p->last_run = jiffies;
> + p->sleep_timestamp = jiffies;
>
> Now the system behaves as it should!
This seems to confirm it was one of the interactivity changes that went
into 2.5.65. I figured as much but it is nice to get confirmation.
Thank you for trying this.
Now to figure out which one...
> My system is a P-III 700 (Inspiron 4000),
> and Debian (X is running at nice = -10).
I wonder if the reniced X is a factor?
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-29 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-29 21:32 Bad interactive behaviour in 2.5.65-66 (sched.c) Peter Lundkvist
2003-03-29 23:23 ` Robert Love [this message]
2003-03-30 1:21 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-03-30 2:05 ` Robert Love
2003-03-30 2:33 ` Con Kolivas
2003-03-30 2:46 ` Robert Love
2003-03-30 3:58 ` Tom Sightler
2003-03-30 5:23 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-30 19:24 ` Tom Sightler
2003-04-01 1:41 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2003-03-30 14:14 ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-30 21:06 ` Con Kolivas
2003-03-31 2:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-31 6:35 ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-31 7:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-31 8:46 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-03-31 8:54 ` Nick Piggin
2003-04-20 3:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-04-18 13:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-30 10:16 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-03-30 11:18 ` Mika Liljeberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1048980204.13757.17.camel@localhost \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=p.lundkvist@telia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.