From: Eric St-Laurent <ericstl34@sympatico.ca>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scheduler interactivity: timeslice calculation seem wrong
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 01:06:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1061269559.5853.7.camel@orbiter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1061267367.3f41a7a70f007@kolivas.org>
> There's a scheduler implementation dating pre 1970 that does this and I am led
> to believe someone is working on an implementation for perhaps 2.7
The first implementation is in 1962 with CTSS if i remember correctly.
Multics initially had something like that too.
http://www.multicians.org/mult-sched.html
Anyway that's pretty standard CS stuff. Multi-level Queues with
feedback, exponentially longer timeslices with lower priority.
I was reading this recently, that's why i wondered why linux calculate
timeslice "inversed" versus what is proposed in theory.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-19 5:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-19 2:54 scheduler interactivity: timeslice calculation seem wrong Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 3:06 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-19 4:07 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 5:23 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-19 6:54 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 19:18 ` bill davidsen
2003-08-19 23:48 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 23:54 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 19:01 ` bill davidsen
2003-08-20 0:15 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-20 0:32 ` David Lang
2003-08-20 0:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-20 4:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-20 4:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-20 13:59 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-08-20 16:18 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-20 2:52 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-19 19:02 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-19 17:51 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-20 2:41 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-20 18:45 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-19 4:13 ` Con Kolivas
2003-08-19 4:23 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 4:29 ` Con Kolivas
2003-08-19 5:06 ` Eric St-Laurent [this message]
2003-08-19 6:18 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1061269559.5853.7.camel@orbiter \
--to=ericstl34@sympatico.ca \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.