From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>
Cc: Eric St-Laurent <ericstl34@sympatico.ca>,
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scheduler interactivity: timeslice calculation seem wrong
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:48:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030820004851.GD4306@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308191731230.22008-100000@dlang.diginsite.com>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 05:32:04PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> while thinking about scaling based on CPU speed remember systems with
> variable CPU clocks (or even just variable performance like the transmeta
> CPU's)
This and/or mixed cpu speeds could make load balancing interesting on
SMP. I wonder who's tried. jejb?
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-20 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-19 2:54 scheduler interactivity: timeslice calculation seem wrong Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 3:06 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-19 4:07 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 5:23 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-19 6:54 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 19:18 ` bill davidsen
2003-08-19 23:48 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 23:54 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 19:01 ` bill davidsen
2003-08-20 0:15 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-20 0:32 ` David Lang
2003-08-20 0:48 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-08-20 4:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-20 4:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-20 13:59 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-08-20 16:18 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-20 2:52 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-19 19:02 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-19 17:51 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-20 2:41 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-20 18:45 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-19 4:13 ` Con Kolivas
2003-08-19 4:23 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 4:29 ` Con Kolivas
2003-08-19 5:06 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 6:18 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030820004851.GD4306@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=ericstl34@sympatico.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.