From: Nicolas.Mailhot@laPoste.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
To: Ton Hospel <linux-kernel@ton.iguana.be>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm78@stimpy.netroedge.com
Subject: Sensors and linux 2.6.0-test4-bk8 question
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:24:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1062952680.9123.0.camel@rousalka.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1062934034.7923.2.camel@rousalka.dyndns.org>
Ton Hospel replied to me
|> I know libsensors is not yet 2.6 aware, but I thought sensed values
|> where available in sysfs if one wanted to manually read them. Since I
|> have via hardware:
|If there is any interest, I have a perl program that does a configurable
|display for 2.6.
Sure there is interest:)
|>
|> Now there is no sensor-related message as far as I can see in my dmesg,
|> and I do not seem to find any temperature/fan related info in /sys:
|>
|You still need the bus and chip drivers before anything appears.
|Which ones is basically the same as with the old lmsensors stuff, so
|look in their docs.
But how can I check the damn things work ? Sensors writers seem to
have eschewed the nice messages every other driver writer put in dmesg to
tell me their stuff is correctly loaded.
For example I have :
"SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000"
in "/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/i2c-3/name" so I suppose via-pro
at least is loaded (fully ?). Which should be the bus stuff I think. For
the chip stuff that would be VIA686A (?) But how am I supposed to check the
darn thing works with nothing in dmesg ? I've already combed sysfs for clues
and found nothing.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?numériquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_signée?Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20030907/7edabeeb/attachment.bin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Mailhot <Nicolas.Mailhot@laPoste.net>
To: Ton Hospel <linux-kernel@ton.iguana.be>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm78@stimpy.netroedge.com
Subject: Re: Sensors and linux 2.6.0-test4-bk8 question
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 18:38:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1062952680.9123.0.camel@rousalka.dyndns.org> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1251 bytes --]
Ton Hospel replied to me
|> I know libsensors is not yet 2.6 aware, but I thought sensed values
|> where available in sysfs if one wanted to manually read them. Since I
|> have via hardware:
|If there is any interest, I have a perl program that does a configurable
|display for 2.6.
Sure there is interest:)
|>
|> Now there is no sensor-related message as far as I can see in my dmesg,
|> and I do not seem to find any temperature/fan related info in /sys:
|>
|You still need the bus and chip drivers before anything appears.
|Which ones is basically the same as with the old lmsensors stuff, so
|look in their docs.
But how can I check the damn things work ? Sensors writers seem to
have eschewed the nice messages every other driver writer put in dmesg to
tell me their stuff is correctly loaded.
For example I have :
"SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000"
in "/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/i2c-3/name" so I suppose via-pro
at least is loaded (fully ?). Which should be the bus stuff I think. For
the chip stuff that would be VIA686A (?) But how am I supposed to check the
darn thing works with nothing in dmesg ? I've already combed sysfs for clues
and found nothing.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot
[-- Attachment #2: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-19 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-07 16:38 Nicolas Mailhot [this message]
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Sensors and linux 2.6.0-test4-bk8 question Nicolas Mailhot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-08 6:20 "Andrey Borzenkov"
2003-09-07 11:27 Nicolas Mailhot
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Nicolas Mailhot
2003-09-07 15:09 ` Ton Hospel
2003-09-07 17:35 ` Josh McKinney
[not found] ` <20030907173515.GA15338@_orming>
2003-09-07 20:17 ` Ton Hospel
2003-09-09 17:06 ` Ton Hospel
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Nicolas Mailhot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1062952680.9123.0.camel@rousalka.dyndns.org \
--to=nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@ton.iguana.be \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm78@stimpy.netroedge.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.