From: Michael Uhler <uhler@mips.com>
To: "Finney, Steve" <Steve.Finney@spirentcom.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: 64 bit operations w/32 bit kernel
Date: 29 Sep 2003 12:01:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1064862114.11818.21.camel@uhler-linux.mips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DC1BF43A8FAE654DA6B3FB7836DD3A56DEB75C@iris.adtech-inc.com>
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 10:31, Finney, Steve wrote:
> What would be the downside to enabling 64 bit operations in user space on a 32 bit kernel (setting the PX bit in the status register?). The particular issue is that I want to access 64 bit-memory mapped registers, and I really need to do it as an atomic operation. I tried borrowing sibyte/64bit.h from the kernel, but I get an illegal instruction on the double ops.
>
The most glaring problem is you violate the rule that the 64-bit GPRs
are sign-extended when running a 32-bit binary. There are all kinds
of assumptions in the hardware and software that depend on the
GPRs being sign-extended, and to violate this will risk some
serious instability of the software.
> Also, assuming this isn't a horrible idea, is there any obvious single place where "default" values in the CP0 status register get set?
>
> Thanks,
> sf
--
Michael Uhler, Chief Technology Officer
MIPS Technologies, Inc. Email: uhler@mips.com Pager:uhler_p@mips.com
1225 Charleston Road Voice: (650)567-5025 FAX: (650)567-5225
Mountain View, CA 94043 Mobile: (650)868-6870 Admin: (650)567-5085
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-29 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-29 17:31 64 bit operations w/32 bit kernel Finney, Steve
2003-09-29 17:31 ` Finney, Steve
2003-09-29 19:01 ` Michael Uhler [this message]
2003-09-30 14:49 ` Kip Walker
2003-09-30 16:00 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-09-30 18:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-30 18:47 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-10-01 3:58 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-30 18:29 ` Michael Uhler
2003-09-30 19:10 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-30 19:27 ` Michael Uhler
2003-10-01 4:26 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-10-01 16:24 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-09-30 19:48 ` Ralf Baechle
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-30 19:23 Finney, Steve
2003-09-30 19:23 ` Finney, Steve
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1064862114.11818.21.camel@uhler-linux.mips.com \
--to=uhler@mips.com \
--cc=Steve.Finney@spirentcom.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.