From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: "Finney, Steve" <Steve.Finney@SpirentCom.COM>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: 64 bit operations w/32 bit kernel
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:47:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030930184755.GA12599@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1030930195415.11368C-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 08:04:42PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > > What would be the downside to enabling 64 bit operations in user space
> > > on a 32 bit kernel (setting the PX bit in the status register?). The
> > > particular issue is that I want to access 64 bit-memory mapped registers,
> > > and I really need to do it as an atomic operation. I tried borrowing
> > > sibyte/64bit.h from the kernel, but I get an illegal instruction on the
> > > double ops.
> >
> > Common design bug in hardware, imho ...
>
> Well, ioremap() can be used to get at these areas (as well as any
> others), whether we call it a bug or not.
What I called a bug is the necessity to access hardware registers with
64-bit loads and stores in some systems as opposed to of 32-bit
instructions - that simply doesn't work from 32-bit universes.
To clarify, it was my understanding of Steve's problem he needs 64-bit
loads and stores, not something in the 64-bit physical address space.
The later problem obviously would get a different answer.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-30 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-29 17:31 64 bit operations w/32 bit kernel Finney, Steve
2003-09-29 17:31 ` Finney, Steve
2003-09-29 19:01 ` Michael Uhler
2003-09-30 14:49 ` Kip Walker
2003-09-30 16:00 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-09-30 18:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-30 18:47 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2003-10-01 3:58 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-30 18:29 ` Michael Uhler
2003-09-30 19:10 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-30 19:27 ` Michael Uhler
2003-10-01 4:26 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-10-01 16:24 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-09-30 19:48 ` Ralf Baechle
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-30 19:23 Finney, Steve
2003-09-30 19:23 ` Finney, Steve
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030930184755.GA12599@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=Steve.Finney@SpirentCom.COM \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.