From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: -mregparm=3 (was Re: [PATCH] i386 do_machine_check() is redundant.
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:48:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1064936898.4568.34.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200309301437.h8UEbSvl017305@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 10:37, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> Well, abs() is the only one I tripped over in my config. I'm sure there's others
> lurking elsewhere in the kernel tree.
There are not _too_ many builtins. abs, strcpy, et cetera ...
> The bigger question is whether a patch to support -ffreestanding would be a
> good idea - with proper use of the __builtin_* stuff it *should* work, and it will
> hopefully cause better kernel code hygiene..
I agree. We should go for it.
Robert Love
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-30 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-28 16:29 [PATCH] i386 do_machine_check() is redundant Brian Gerst
2003-09-28 18:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-28 18:30 ` Brian Gerst
2003-09-28 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-28 18:44 ` Brian Gerst
2003-09-28 19:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-09-29 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-29 19:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-29 19:54 ` -mregparm=3 (was " Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-30 8:28 ` Helge Hafting
2003-09-30 15:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-30 15:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-29 20:20 ` Mikulas Patocka
2003-09-29 20:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-29 21:36 ` Mikulas Patocka
2003-09-29 21:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-29 21:43 ` Mikulas Patocka
2003-09-29 21:48 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-09-30 0:24 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-30 4:49 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-30 4:55 ` Robert Love
2003-09-30 14:37 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-30 15:48 ` Robert Love [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1064936898.4568.34.camel@localhost \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.