* Re: High speed filesystems
2003-10-10 19:19 High speed filesystems Brian Beattie
@ 2003-10-10 8:33 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2003-10-11 7:19 ` Charles Manning
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joseph D. Wagner @ 2003-10-10 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Beattie, linux-fsdevel
On Saturday 11 October 2003 01:19 am, Brian Beattie wrote:
> I investigating options for very high speed datalogging. I was
> wondering if anybody could point me at any information and/or code in
> this area.
http://www.sgi.com/products/storage/tech/file_systems.html
If you don't like CXFS, scroll down to XFS and follow the links.
Joseph D. Wagner
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* High speed filesystems
@ 2003-10-10 19:19 Brian Beattie
2003-10-10 8:33 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2003-10-11 7:19 ` Charles Manning
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brian Beattie @ 2003-10-10 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-fsdevel
I investigating options for very high speed datalogging. I was
wondering if anybody could point me at any information and/or code in
this area.
--
Brian Beattie | Experienced kernel hacker/embedded systems
beattie@beattie-home.net | programmer, direct or contract, short or
www.beattie-home.net | long term, available immediately.
"Honor isn't about making the right choices.
It's about dealing with the consequences." -- Midori Koto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: High speed filesystems
2003-10-10 19:19 High speed filesystems Brian Beattie
2003-10-10 8:33 ` Joseph D. Wagner
@ 2003-10-11 7:19 ` Charles Manning
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Charles Manning @ 2003-10-11 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Beattie, linux-fsdevel
On Saturday 11 October 2003 08:19, Brian Beattie wrote:
> I investigating options for very high speed datalogging. I was
> wondering if anybody could point me at any information and/or code in
> this area.
You'll get different results depending on how your data logging application
works and the equipemt you are using. Things to consider:
* Robustness: apart from the speed, do you have robustness concerns? eg. Do
you expect power loss etc. If so, you'll need a fs that tolerates this.
* Does you applicaion typically just do large append style transactions? If
so, a fs that is inclined that way will do better than one designed for itty
bitty transactions. Indeed if all you want to do is create a single monster
file, then you could probably get the best performance without any file
system (ie just write lumps of data directly to a block driver).
* Are you using wierdo media like flash instead of a hard disk? If so, then a
flash oriented fs like JFFS2 or YAFFS might be the thing.
-- CHarles
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-11 7:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-10 19:19 High speed filesystems Brian Beattie
2003-10-10 8:33 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2003-10-11 7:19 ` Charles Manning
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.