All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
To: "Noah J. Misch" <noah-7GExONQZ6ZKVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-kernel
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
	shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	jon-fdRWMHV75ajk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] test9 ACPI bad: scheduling while atomic!
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 09:47:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1067273229.7497.30.camel@patsy.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0310262327040.19469-8Uwgm7wxmYs@public.gmane.org>

On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 01:22, Noah J. Misch wrote:

> This problem stems from the changes in revision 1.26 of drivers/acpi/ec.c.
> They come from a patch Shaohua Li submitted for kernel bug 1171 at
> bugme.osdl.org.  That patch can cause acpi_ec_gpe_query to run in interrupt
> context, whereas before it always ran from a workqueue.  It does non-interrupt
> like things, like sleeping and kmalloc'ing with GFP_KERNEL.
> 
> This was obvious on my system because it has no ECDT table, and as such
> acpi_ec_gpe_query was _always_ running in interrupt context, whereas with an
> ECDT it would only do so for a brief time during boot, and the problem would be
> much more subtle.  That's probably why nobody noticed this in earlier tests.
> 

  I don't have an ECDT either.  Is it possible that the setting of
ec_device_init = 1 is simply misplaced?  I can see why we wouldn't want
to call acpi_os_queue_for_execution() early in bootup, but there ought
to be a fixed point after which it's ok, regardless of whether the
system has the ECDT table.  Would it be sufficient to set ec_device_init
to 1 at the beginning of acpi_ec_add(), with no dependency on the ECDT
table?

	Alex

-- 
Alex Williamson                             HP Linux & Open Source Lab



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Community?  Make a contribution, and help us add new
features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
To: "Noah J. Misch" <noah@caltech.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, shaohua.li@intel.com,
	len.brown@intel.com, jon@nanocrew.net
Subject: Re: [BUG] test9 ACPI bad: scheduling while atomic!
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 09:47:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1067273229.7497.30.camel@patsy.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0310262327040.19469@clyde>

On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 01:22, Noah J. Misch wrote:

> This problem stems from the changes in revision 1.26 of drivers/acpi/ec.c.
> They come from a patch Shaohua Li submitted for kernel bug 1171 at
> bugme.osdl.org.  That patch can cause acpi_ec_gpe_query to run in interrupt
> context, whereas before it always ran from a workqueue.  It does non-interrupt
> like things, like sleeping and kmalloc'ing with GFP_KERNEL.
> 
> This was obvious on my system because it has no ECDT table, and as such
> acpi_ec_gpe_query was _always_ running in interrupt context, whereas with an
> ECDT it would only do so for a brief time during boot, and the problem would be
> much more subtle.  That's probably why nobody noticed this in earlier tests.
> 

  I don't have an ECDT either.  Is it possible that the setting of
ec_device_init = 1 is simply misplaced?  I can see why we wouldn't want
to call acpi_os_queue_for_execution() early in bootup, but there ought
to be a fixed point after which it's ok, regardless of whether the
system has the ECDT table.  Would it be sufficient to set ec_device_init
to 1 at the beginning of acpi_ec_add(), with no dependency on the ECDT
table?

	Alex

-- 
Alex Williamson                             HP Linux & Open Source Lab


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-10-27 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-27  8:22 [BUG] test9 ACPI bad: scheduling while atomic! Noah J. Misch
2003-10-27  8:22 ` Noah J. Misch
     [not found] ` <Pine.GSO.4.58.0310262327040.19469-8Uwgm7wxmYs@public.gmane.org>
2003-10-27 16:47   ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2003-10-27 16:47     ` Alex Williamson
     [not found]     ` <1067273229.7497.30.camel-Wmjt7DDUnIVxnVILBQAtiA@public.gmane.org>
2003-10-27 18:02       ` Noah J. Misch
2003-10-27 18:02         ` Noah J. Misch
2003-10-27 20:24   ` [ACPI] " Nate Lawson
2003-10-27 20:24     ` Nate Lawson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-28  2:52 Li, Shaohua
     [not found] ` <571ACEFD467F7749BC50E0A98C17CDD8D5FDBB-4yWAQGcml64gGBtAFL8yw7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2003-10-28 23:56   ` Noah J. Misch
2003-10-28 23:56     ` Noah J. Misch
2003-10-27  2:23 Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1067273229.7497.30.camel@patsy.fc.hp.com \
    --to=alex.williamson-vxdhtt5mjny@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jon-fdRWMHV75ajk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=noah-7GExONQZ6ZKVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.