From: Mario Giammarco <mgiammarco@virgilio.it>
To: Jeff Woods <kazrak+kernel@cesmail.net>
Cc: Hermann Himmelbauer <dusty@strike.wu-wien.ac.at>,
maarten van den Berg <maarten@vbvb.nl>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID1 VS RAID5
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 11:45:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1067337910.1283.5.camel@cala> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20031027015844.03a85e68@no.incoming.mail>
Il lun, 2003-10-27 alle 11:16, Jeff Woods ha scritto:
> Alternating I/Os between two spindles on a RAID1 pair won't (in general)
> speed up the transfer rate.
Are you sure? Have you done some tests? Because I think the opposite.
> Leaving the other
> spindle available to seek to another part of the drive and provide double
> the bandwidth has major advantages in a multiprocessing environment
Is good but I do not need it...
> OTOH, you have access to the source code if you really want to try it
> another way.
So again my first question thats seems to go ignored: does someone have
made a patch? Is there some line to put in raidtab to change raid1
behavior?
--
Mario Giammarco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-28 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-26 14:45 RAID1 VS RAID5 Mario Giammarco
2003-10-26 16:16 ` maarten van den Berg
2003-10-26 18:22 ` Mario Giammarco
2003-10-27 8:27 ` Hermann Himmelbauer
2003-10-27 9:54 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2003-10-27 10:16 ` Jeff Woods
2003-10-28 10:45 ` Mario Giammarco [this message]
2003-10-27 11:08 ` maarten van den Berg
2003-10-27 12:03 ` Jeff Woods
2003-10-26 16:55 ` Matti Aarnio
2003-10-28 10:46 ` Mario Giammarco
2003-10-27 8:33 ` Hermann Himmelbauer
2003-10-27 9:19 ` Gordon Henderson
2003-10-27 11:01 ` Hermann Himmelbauer
2003-10-27 13:40 ` Gordon Henderson
2003-10-27 15:34 ` Hermann Himmelbauer
2003-10-27 14:17 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2003-10-27 15:52 ` Andrew Herdman
2003-10-28 10:40 ` Mario Giammarco
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-05 16:24 raid1 vs raid5 Psalle
2016-01-06 8:09 ` Sean Greenslade
2016-01-20 14:17 ` Psalle
2003-10-26 11:24 RAID1 VS RAID5 Mario Giammarco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1067337910.1283.5.camel@cala \
--to=mgiammarco@virgilio.it \
--cc=dusty@strike.wu-wien.ac.at \
--cc=kazrak+kernel@cesmail.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten@vbvb.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.