From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
To: Hermann Himmelbauer <dusty@strike.wu-wien.ac.at>,
maarten van den Berg <maarten@vbvb.nl>,
Mario Giammarco <mgiammarco@virgilio.it>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID1 VS RAID5
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 10:54:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031027095434.GB13640@marowsky-bree.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200310270927.32751.dusty@strike.wu-wien.ac.at>
On 2003-10-27T09:27:32,
Hermann Himmelbauer <dusty@strike.wu-wien.ac.at> said:
> When reading a file from the RAID1, you could e.g. read the first block from
> the first disk, the second from the second disk, the third from the first
> disk and so on.
>
> This would *theoretically* double the read speed - like with RAID0.
For pure reads, that may be true. But for writes, the disks have to
resynchronize their heads and then you would get a penalty there.
It all depends ;-)
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
--
High Availability & Clustering \ ever tried. ever failed. no matter.
SUSE Labs | try again. fail again. fail better.
Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG \ -- Samuel Beckett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-27 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-26 14:45 RAID1 VS RAID5 Mario Giammarco
2003-10-26 16:16 ` maarten van den Berg
2003-10-26 18:22 ` Mario Giammarco
2003-10-27 8:27 ` Hermann Himmelbauer
2003-10-27 9:54 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree [this message]
2003-10-27 10:16 ` Jeff Woods
2003-10-28 10:45 ` Mario Giammarco
2003-10-27 11:08 ` maarten van den Berg
2003-10-27 12:03 ` Jeff Woods
2003-10-26 16:55 ` Matti Aarnio
2003-10-28 10:46 ` Mario Giammarco
2003-10-27 8:33 ` Hermann Himmelbauer
2003-10-27 9:19 ` Gordon Henderson
2003-10-27 11:01 ` Hermann Himmelbauer
2003-10-27 13:40 ` Gordon Henderson
2003-10-27 15:34 ` Hermann Himmelbauer
2003-10-27 14:17 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2003-10-27 15:52 ` Andrew Herdman
2003-10-28 10:40 ` Mario Giammarco
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-05 16:24 raid1 vs raid5 Psalle
2016-01-06 8:09 ` Sean Greenslade
2016-01-20 14:17 ` Psalle
2003-10-26 11:24 RAID1 VS RAID5 Mario Giammarco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031027095434.GB13640@marowsky-bree.de \
--to=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=dusty@strike.wu-wien.ac.at \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten@vbvb.nl \
--cc=mgiammarco@virgilio.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.