From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Eric Whiting <ewhiting@amis.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: -mmX 4G patches feedback [numbers: how much performance impact]
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 15:54:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10680000.1081378467@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040406175722.GE2234@dualathlon.random>
>> is on you. And if you think i'm upset about your approach to this whole
>> issue then you are damn right.)
>
> the one upset should be the users running 30% slower with stuff like
> mysql just because they own a 4/8G box. There's little interest from my
> part to spend time on 4:4 stuff when things are so obvious (I want
> however to try to benchmark the HZ=1000 with the hint).
Isn't that scenario fixed up by vsyscall gettimeofday already?
Or was this another workload, where gettimeofday wasn't the problem?
M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-07 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-05 16:36 -mmX 4G patches feedback Eric Whiting
2004-04-05 17:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-05 21:35 ` Eric Whiting
2004-04-05 22:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 11:55 ` -mmX 4G patches feedback [numbers: how much performance impact] Ingo Molnar
2004-04-06 14:49 ` Eric Whiting
2004-04-06 15:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 16:13 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-04-06 16:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 17:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-06 17:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 22:54 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2004-04-07 22:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 19:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-06 20:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 6:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 6:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-07 7:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 8:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-07 21:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 17:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-07 21:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 22:58 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-07 23:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 23:21 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-07 23:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 23:34 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 0:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 6:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 21:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 22:19 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 22:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 23:14 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 23:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 23:42 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 23:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 21:19 ` -mmX 4G patches feedback Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-07 21:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-06 17:59 -mmX 4G patches feedback [numbers: how much performance impact] Manfred Spraul
2004-04-06 18:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10680000.1081378467@flay \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=ewhiting@amis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.