* MTD and Intel rev J Strata Flash
@ 2003-11-20 14:36 ghannon
2003-11-20 14:42 ` John Whitney
2003-11-20 14:46 ` Gary Thomas
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ghannon @ 2003-11-20 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-embedded
Hi,
I'm assuming the linux-mtd list has long since vanished.
I'm working with a rev J strata flash part.
It has the "feature" that it's lock-bits can be set individually,
but are cleared colllectively. I have made a 3 partition system
where I mainly want two partitions locked except when I am updating
them, and the third one unlocked always.
Has any effort been put into the MTD layer to take into account that
an unlock clears all the bits and some should be put back on.
I didn't see anything like that in the code.
I will put the functionality into my tools if it is not in a lower layer
already.
Thanks,
Gary Hannon
CSPI
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: MTD and Intel rev J Strata Flash
2003-11-20 14:36 MTD and Intel rev J Strata Flash ghannon
@ 2003-11-20 14:42 ` John Whitney
2003-11-20 14:46 ` Gary Thomas
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: John Whitney @ 2003-11-20 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ghannon, Mailing List: linuxppc-embedded
Linux-MTD is alive and well at linux-mtd.infradead.org. Access to the
mailing list can be found there as well.
John Whitney
On 11/20/03 9:36 AM, "ghannon@cspi.com" <ghannon@cspi.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm assuming the linux-mtd list has long since vanished.
>
> I'm working with a rev J strata flash part.
>
> It has the "feature" that it's lock-bits can be set individually,
> but are cleared colllectively. I have made a 3 partition system
> where I mainly want two partitions locked except when I am updating
> them, and the third one unlocked always.
>
> Has any effort been put into the MTD layer to take into account that
> an unlock clears all the bits and some should be put back on.
> I didn't see anything like that in the code.
>
> I will put the functionality into my tools if it is not in a lower layer
> already.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gary Hannon
> CSPI
>
>
>
>
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: MTD and Intel rev J Strata Flash
2003-11-20 14:36 MTD and Intel rev J Strata Flash ghannon
2003-11-20 14:42 ` John Whitney
@ 2003-11-20 14:46 ` Gary Thomas
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gary Thomas @ 2003-11-20 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ghannon; +Cc: linux-mtd
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 07:36, ghannon@cspi.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm assuming the linux-mtd list has long since vanished.
Not that I'm aware of - I've copied this to that list.
>
> I'm working with a rev J strata flash part.
>
> It has the "feature" that it's lock-bits can be set individually,
> but are cleared colllectively. I have made a 3 partition system
> where I mainly want two partitions locked except when I am updating
> them, and the third one unlocked always.
>
> Has any effort been put into the MTD layer to take into account that
> an unlock clears all the bits and some should be put back on.
> I didn't see anything like that in the code.
>
> I will put the functionality into my tools if it is not in a lower layer
> already.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gary Hannon
> CSPI
>
>
> ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
--
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
MLB Associates
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-11-20 14:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-11-20 14:36 MTD and Intel rev J Strata Flash ghannon
2003-11-20 14:42 ` John Whitney
2003-11-20 14:46 ` Gary Thomas
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.