From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: stable@kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Banks <gnb@melbourne.sgi.com>
Subject: [PATCH 001 of 2] knfsd: Use a spinlock to protect sk_info_authunix
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:01:41 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1070417020141.28483@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20070417115242.28047.patches@notabene
sk_info_authunix is not being protected properly so the object that
it points to can be cache_put twice, leading to corruption.
We borrow svsk->sk_defer_lock to provide the protection. We should probably
rename that lock to have a more generic name - later.
Thanks to Gabriel for reporting this.
Cc: Greg Banks <gnb@melbourne.sgi.com>
Cc: Gabriel Barazer <gabriel@oxeva.fr>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
### Diffstat output
./net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff .prev/net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c ./net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c
--- .prev/net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c 2007-04-17 11:42:14.000000000 +1000
+++ ./net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c 2007-04-17 11:42:21.000000000 +1000
@@ -383,7 +383,10 @@ void svcauth_unix_purge(void)
static inline struct ip_map *
ip_map_cached_get(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
{
- struct ip_map *ipm = rqstp->rq_sock->sk_info_authunix;
+ struct ip_map *ipm;
+ struct svc_sock *svsk = rqstp->rq_sock;
+ spin_lock_bh(&svsk->sk_defer_lock);
+ ipm = svsk->sk_info_authunix;
if (ipm != NULL) {
if (!cache_valid(&ipm->h)) {
/*
@@ -391,12 +394,14 @@ ip_map_cached_get(struct svc_rqst *rqstp
* remembered, e.g. by a second mount from the
* same IP address.
*/
- rqstp->rq_sock->sk_info_authunix = NULL;
+ svsk->sk_info_authunix = NULL;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&svsk->sk_defer_lock);
cache_put(&ipm->h, &ip_map_cache);
return NULL;
}
cache_get(&ipm->h);
}
+ spin_unlock_bh(&svsk->sk_defer_lock);
return ipm;
}
@@ -405,9 +410,15 @@ ip_map_cached_put(struct svc_rqst *rqstp
{
struct svc_sock *svsk = rqstp->rq_sock;
- if (svsk->sk_sock->type == SOCK_STREAM && svsk->sk_info_authunix == NULL)
- svsk->sk_info_authunix = ipm; /* newly cached, keep the reference */
- else
+ spin_lock_bh(&svsk->sk_defer_lock);
+ if (svsk->sk_sock->type == SOCK_STREAM &&
+ svsk->sk_info_authunix == NULL) {
+ /* newly cached, keep the reference */
+ svsk->sk_info_authunix = ipm;
+ ipm = NULL;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_bh(&svsk->sk_defer_lock);
+ if (ipm)
cache_put(&ipm->h, &ip_map_cache);
}
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Banks <gnb@melbourne.sgi.com>
Cc: Gabriel Barazer <gabriel@oxeva.fr>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 001 of 2] knfsd: Use a spinlock to protect sk_info_authunix
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:01:41 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1070417020141.28483@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20070417115242.28047.patches@notabene
sk_info_authunix is not being protected properly so the object that
it points to can be cache_put twice, leading to corruption.
We borrow svsk->sk_defer_lock to provide the protection. We should probably
rename that lock to have a more generic name - later.
Thanks to Gabriel for reporting this.
Cc: Greg Banks <gnb@melbourne.sgi.com>
Cc: Gabriel Barazer <gabriel@oxeva.fr>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
### Diffstat output
./net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff .prev/net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c ./net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c
--- .prev/net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c 2007-04-17 11:42:14.000000000 +1000
+++ ./net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c 2007-04-17 11:42:21.000000000 +1000
@@ -383,7 +383,10 @@ void svcauth_unix_purge(void)
static inline struct ip_map *
ip_map_cached_get(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
{
- struct ip_map *ipm = rqstp->rq_sock->sk_info_authunix;
+ struct ip_map *ipm;
+ struct svc_sock *svsk = rqstp->rq_sock;
+ spin_lock_bh(&svsk->sk_defer_lock);
+ ipm = svsk->sk_info_authunix;
if (ipm != NULL) {
if (!cache_valid(&ipm->h)) {
/*
@@ -391,12 +394,14 @@ ip_map_cached_get(struct svc_rqst *rqstp
* remembered, e.g. by a second mount from the
* same IP address.
*/
- rqstp->rq_sock->sk_info_authunix = NULL;
+ svsk->sk_info_authunix = NULL;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&svsk->sk_defer_lock);
cache_put(&ipm->h, &ip_map_cache);
return NULL;
}
cache_get(&ipm->h);
}
+ spin_unlock_bh(&svsk->sk_defer_lock);
return ipm;
}
@@ -405,9 +410,15 @@ ip_map_cached_put(struct svc_rqst *rqstp
{
struct svc_sock *svsk = rqstp->rq_sock;
- if (svsk->sk_sock->type == SOCK_STREAM && svsk->sk_info_authunix == NULL)
- svsk->sk_info_authunix = ipm; /* newly cached, keep the reference */
- else
+ spin_lock_bh(&svsk->sk_defer_lock);
+ if (svsk->sk_sock->type == SOCK_STREAM &&
+ svsk->sk_info_authunix == NULL) {
+ /* newly cached, keep the reference */
+ svsk->sk_info_authunix = ipm;
+ ipm = NULL;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_bh(&svsk->sk_defer_lock);
+ if (ipm)
cache_put(&ipm->h, &ip_map_cache);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-17 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-17 2:01 [PATCH 000 of 2] knfsd: Close oopsable race in nfsd NeilBrown
2007-04-17 2:01 ` NeilBrown
2007-04-17 2:01 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2007-04-17 2:01 ` [PATCH 001 of 2] knfsd: Use a spinlock to protect sk_info_authunix NeilBrown
2007-04-17 2:01 ` [PATCH 002 of 2] knfsd: Rename sk_defer_lock to sk_lock NeilBrown
2007-04-17 2:01 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1070417020141.28483@suse.de \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gnb@melbourne.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.