All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 005 of 8] knfsd: Simplify a 'while' condition in svcsock.c
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 10:35:45 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1070507003545.24158@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20070507103211.23855.patches@notabene


This while loop has an overly complex condition, which performs a
couple of assignments.  This hurts readability.

We don't really need a loop at all.  We can just return -EAGAIN and
(providing we set SK_DATA), the function will be called again.

So discard the loop, make the complex conditional become a few clear
function calls, and hopefully improve readability.


Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>

### Diffstat output
 ./net/sunrpc/svcsock.c |   21 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff .prev/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c ./net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
--- .prev/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c	2007-05-07 10:30:16.000000000 +1000
+++ ./net/sunrpc/svcsock.c	2007-05-07 10:31:04.000000000 +1000
@@ -788,15 +788,20 @@ svc_udp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
 	}
 
 	clear_bit(SK_DATA, &svsk->sk_flags);
-	while ((err = kernel_recvmsg(svsk->sk_sock, &msg, NULL,
-				     0, 0, MSG_PEEK | MSG_DONTWAIT)) < 0 ||
-	       (skb = skb_recv_datagram(svsk->sk_sk, 0, 1, &err)) == NULL) {
-		if (err == -EAGAIN) {
-			svc_sock_received(svsk);
-			return err;
+	skb = NULL;
+	err = kernel_recvmsg(svsk->sk_sock, &msg, NULL,
+			     0, 0, MSG_PEEK | MSG_DONTWAIT);
+	if (err >= 0)
+		skb = skb_recv_datagram(svsk->sk_sk, 0, 1, &err);
+
+	if (skb == NULL) {
+		if (err != -EAGAIN) {
+			/* possibly an icmp error */
+			dprintk("svc: recvfrom returned error %d\n", -err);
+			set_bit(SK_DATA, &svsk->sk_flags);
 		}
-		/* possibly an icmp error */
-		dprintk("svc: recvfrom returned error %d\n", -err);
+		svc_sock_received(svsk);
+		return -EAGAIN;
 	}
 	rqstp->rq_addrlen = sizeof(rqstp->rq_addr);
 	if (skb->tstamp.tv64 == 0) {

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 005 of 8] knfsd: Simplify a 'while' condition in svcsock.c
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 10:35:45 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1070507003545.24158@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20070507103211.23855.patches@notabene


This while loop has an overly complex condition, which performs a
couple of assignments.  This hurts readability.

We don't really need a loop at all.  We can just return -EAGAIN and
(providing we set SK_DATA), the function will be called again.

So discard the loop, make the complex conditional become a few clear
function calls, and hopefully improve readability.


Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>

### Diffstat output
 ./net/sunrpc/svcsock.c |   21 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff .prev/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c ./net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
--- .prev/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c	2007-05-07 10:30:16.000000000 +1000
+++ ./net/sunrpc/svcsock.c	2007-05-07 10:31:04.000000000 +1000
@@ -788,15 +788,20 @@ svc_udp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
 	}
 
 	clear_bit(SK_DATA, &svsk->sk_flags);
-	while ((err = kernel_recvmsg(svsk->sk_sock, &msg, NULL,
-				     0, 0, MSG_PEEK | MSG_DONTWAIT)) < 0 ||
-	       (skb = skb_recv_datagram(svsk->sk_sk, 0, 1, &err)) == NULL) {
-		if (err == -EAGAIN) {
-			svc_sock_received(svsk);
-			return err;
+	skb = NULL;
+	err = kernel_recvmsg(svsk->sk_sock, &msg, NULL,
+			     0, 0, MSG_PEEK | MSG_DONTWAIT);
+	if (err >= 0)
+		skb = skb_recv_datagram(svsk->sk_sk, 0, 1, &err);
+
+	if (skb == NULL) {
+		if (err != -EAGAIN) {
+			/* possibly an icmp error */
+			dprintk("svc: recvfrom returned error %d\n", -err);
+			set_bit(SK_DATA, &svsk->sk_flags);
 		}
-		/* possibly an icmp error */
-		dprintk("svc: recvfrom returned error %d\n", -err);
+		svc_sock_received(svsk);
+		return -EAGAIN;
 	}
 	rqstp->rq_addrlen = sizeof(rqstp->rq_addr);
 	if (skb->tstamp.tv64 == 0) {

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-07  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-07  0:35 [PATCH 000 of 8] knfsd: Assorted bugfixes for 2.6.22 NeilBrown
2007-05-07  0:35 ` NeilBrown
2007-05-07  0:35 ` [PATCH 001 of 8] knfsd: Avoid use of unitialised variables on error path when nfs exports NeilBrown
2007-05-07  0:35   ` NeilBrown
2007-05-07  0:35 ` [PATCH 002 of 8] knfsd: rpc: fix server-side wrapping of krb5i replies NeilBrown
2007-05-07  0:35   ` NeilBrown
2007-05-07  0:35 ` [PATCH 003 of 8] knfsd: Fix resource leak resulting in module refcount leak for rpcsec_gss_krb5.ko NeilBrown
2007-05-07  0:35   ` NeilBrown
2007-05-07  0:35 ` [PATCH 004 of 8] knfsd: rpcgss : RPC_GSS_PROC_ DESTROY request will get a bad rpc NeilBrown
2007-05-07  0:35   ` NeilBrown
2007-05-07  0:35 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2007-05-07  0:35   ` [PATCH 005 of 8] knfsd: Simplify a 'while' condition in svcsock.c NeilBrown
2007-05-07  0:35 ` [PATCH 006 of 8] knfsd: Trivial makefile cleanup NeilBrown
2007-05-07  0:35   ` NeilBrown
2007-05-07  0:35 ` [PATCH 007 of 8] knfsd: Various nfsd xdr cleanups NeilBrown
2007-05-07  0:35   ` NeilBrown
2007-05-07  0:36 ` [PATCH 008 of 8] knfsd: Avoid Oops if buggy userspace performs confusing filehandle->dentry mapping NeilBrown
2007-05-07  0:36   ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1070507003545.24158@suse.de \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.