From: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Maciej Zenczykowski <maze@cela.pl>,
Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:27:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1073694475.6189.176.camel@nomade> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040109204150.A28436@infradead.org>
Le ven 09/01/2004 à 21:41, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 09:20:53PM +0100, Maciej Zenczykowski wrote:
> > I think this points to an 'issue', if we're going to increase the checks
> > in the ELF-loader (and thus increase the size of the minimal valid ELF
> > file we can load, thus effectively 'bloating' (lol) some programs) we
> > should probably allow some sort of direct binary executable files [i.e.
> > header 'XBIN386\0' followed by Read/Execute binary code to execute by
>
> Like binfmt_flat? :)
.. or even zflat. Not that I'm proud of it, but it can effectively
manage to produce rather compact executables :)
Xav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-10 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-09 2:19 [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking Jesper Juhl
2004-01-09 2:27 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-09 3:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-09 3:36 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-09 3:40 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-09 20:20 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2004-01-09 20:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-10 0:27 ` Xavier Bestel [this message]
2004-01-10 2:27 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2004-01-10 9:52 ` Xavier Bestel
2004-01-10 13:41 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-10 22:38 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2004-01-10 22:45 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-10 14:05 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-01-22 19:24 ` [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanitychecking Adrian Bunk
2004-01-09 3:36 ` [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking Jesper Juhl
2004-01-09 4:15 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-01-09 10:28 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-01-09 10:50 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-09 18:08 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-09 18:25 ` Jesper Juhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1073694475.6189.176.camel@nomade \
--to=xavier.bestel@free.fr \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=juhl-lkml@dif.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maze@cela.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.